AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Review: Bulk Review at AD: Cindy, Michelle, Sammi

columbus1231

Registered Member
Messages: 100
Reviews: 9
Joined
#3
Title: Review: Bulk Review at AD: Cindy, Michelle, Sammi (not together)
Date: various
Phone:
City: Ny
State: Ny
Location: Last stop on the elevator of fun.
Age Estimate: 29-38
Nationality: Chinese
Physical Description: Various

Recommendation: Why not? Yes. And YES!!
Thanks for the review. I think I'll try this new agency out. I only like women with natural boobs. So you said Cindy's are natural. Anyone else here?
 

BrettKavanaugh

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,615
Reviews: 95
Joined
#7
A supreme review !
I think Michelle has best tits but who am I to judge?
I see what you did there. Nice.

I uphold that your ruling that Michelle wins the boob award at this particular house....pending an appeal from Bibi's counsel. I look forward to those oral arguments and thorough deliberations.

I do however rate about 10 other pairs generally available this month ahead of Michelle's.

And for those who are sticklers for naturals, don't sleep on Cindy. Instead, change that preposition to "with". The verdict here: guilty! of a top 5 natural set among girls who are currently around, and as high as #2 on a natural girl with a long-limbed trim body. And #1 natural rack with svelte body who is full gfe. So I was right! Using those parameters Cindy is not at all average after all.
 

columbus1231

Registered Member
Messages: 100
Reviews: 9
Joined
#10
I see what you did there. Nice.

I uphold that your ruling that Michelle wins the boob award at this particular house....pending an appeal from Bibi's counsel. I look forward to those oral arguments and thorough deliberations.

I do however rate about 10 other pairs generally available this month ahead of Michelle's.

And for those who are sticklers for naturals, don't sleep on Cindy. Instead, change that preposition to "with". The verdict here: guilty! of a top 5 natural set among girls who are currently around, and as high as #2 on a natural girl with a long-limbed trim body. And #1 natural rack with svelte body who is full gfe. So I was right! Using those parameters Cindy is not at all average after all.
Well, I'm sold. It's Cindy for me then. Hope she works tomorrow.
 

CarlJunior

Review Contributor
Messages: 129
Reviews: 6
Joined
#11
I see what you did there. Nice.

I uphold that your ruling that Michelle wins the boob award at this particular house....pending an appeal from Bibi's counsel. I look forward to those oral arguments and thorough deliberations.

I do however rate about 10 other pairs generally available this month ahead of Michelle's.

And for those who are sticklers for naturals, don't sleep on Cindy. Instead, change that preposition to "with". The verdict here: guilty! of a top 5 natural set among girls who are currently around, and as high as #2 on a natural girl with a long-limbed trim body. And #1 natural rack with svelte body who is full gfe. So I was right! Using those parameters Cindy is not at all average after all.
I like the way you think
 

BrettKavanaugh

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,615
Reviews: 95
Joined
#16
Of the three who has the best endurance? Or do they all tap out early?
All seemed fine on that front. No tapping out. I wouldnt decide between those 3 based on that criteria. Closely related question, in terms of realistic enthusiasm and vigor I'd rank them Cindy, Sammi, Michelle, though I should note I saw Cindy on a quiet Saturday and Michelle immediately after she ran long with another session. And of course that variance is most likely due to personal chemistry, so your rankings may vary.

All 3 win in some category, which is why, even though Cindy was best overall, Im glad I saw all 3 rather than just having 3 sessions with Cindy.

Cindy: best chemistry, thinnest, beautiful natural top.

Michelle: biggest and best (fake) boobs

Sammi: prettiest, best English, youngest looking. Voluptuousness that is simultaneously both a pro and a con.
 

Thanks

Registered Member
Messages: 164
Reviews: 11
Joined
#18
All seemed fine on that front. No tapping out. I wouldnt decide between those 3 based on that criteria. Closely related question, in terms of realistic enthusiasm and vigor I'd rank them Cindy, Sammi, Michelle, though I should note I saw Cindy on a quiet Saturday and Michelle immediately after she ran long with another session. And of course that variance is most likely due to personal chemistry, so your rankings may vary.

All 3 win in some category, which is why, even though Cindy was best overall, Im glad I saw all 3 rather than just having 3 sessions with Cindy.

Cindy: best chemistry, thinnest, beautiful natural top.

Michelle: biggest and best (fake) boobs

Sammi: prettiest, best English, youngest looking. Voluptuousness that is simultaneously both a pro and a con.
I also saw all three, and I agree, if I had 3 appointments to spend I would recommend trying each of them once . Each has their strengths and their styles are quite distinct.
 

BrettKavanaugh

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,615
Reviews: 95
Joined
#19
All 3 win in some category, which is why, even though Cindy was best overall, Im glad I saw all 3 rather than just having 3 sessions with Cindy.

Cindy: best chemistry, thinnest, beautiful natural top.

Michelle: biggest and best (fake) boobs

Sammi: prettiest, best English, youngest looking. Voluptuousness that is simultaneously both a pro and a con.
I can now add Bibi to this compilation of superlatives. She doesnt displace anyone in the above categories, but gets wins in some new categories.

Bibi: oldest in appearance (lets say early 40s, passing for late 30s), most obvious signs of childbirth. BUT most hourglassy figure, and probably a hair ahead of Cindy for best head to toe appearance. Depends on how old you are and your feelings about (younger side of) milfy faces. Like Cindy, a pleasant but not quite pretty face. I'd call Bibi's a more coventional pleasant face, so while I'd rate them about equally, Cindy has a more unique look and more likely to elicit a wider range of opinions.

While Bibi's ass isn't what you see her for, probably the best view in doggie of these 4. Top is both a touch smaller than I had hoped for (but solid Cs) and softer than I had feared. Pretty decent job. So, 3 out of 4 here have really top notch tops.

Sweet personality. Bad English. Service comparable to the others (so, quite good!), though the bbj, while fine, probs ranks 4th out of 4. Touch toothy. They're all kind of screamers, but hers were sort of quiet (dare I say elegant?), more plausible screams compared to Bibi and Michelle.

Overall, I'd still call Cindy my fav of the bunch, due to our chemistry, but Bibi's another solid option here. And, yeah, still glad I had the variety of a 4th girl vs repeating with Cindy.

Btw, saw Sammi on the way out in her towel. I feel a little bad calling her fat before. She's a cutie and a sweetie. A soft round cutie but a cutie. For me personally, the biggest knock on Sammi's look isnt really her belly, it's the weird divot I mentioned in the review.

Next, Stacy. (At least at this place).
 
Top