-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
"To see private content, post a review."
- Thread starter kantuchdis
- Start date
- Status
Getting credit for a review is just to be able to read the private details. If you don't care to read the private details then neither do I.
It is obvious that all those members above do care, I am just saying there may be a reason their reviews are not accepted.
When your one review runs out of status you too may feel different.
Besides putting information in the private details can still and should be respectful of the girl being reviewed. Only you can determine what you feel comfortable with.
No reason for a negative comment, be more constructive, this is all suppose to be more pisitive.
It is obvious that all those members above do care, I am just saying there may be a reason their reviews are not accepted.
When your one review runs out of status you too may feel different.
Besides putting information in the private details can still and should be respectful of the girl being reviewed. Only you can determine what you feel comfortable with.
No reason for a negative comment, be more constructive, this is all suppose to be more pisitive.
"When your one review runs out of status you too may feel different." (From Wayne1250) As you know I joined this site recently, and correct me if I am wrong. Is there a statute of limitation on a parlor review? If my parlor review expired in 30 days and I did not post any parlor review after parlor review expired, the AR Admin will block me from seeing private details?
Visiting 12 parlors a year is child's play. I do that in 2-3 months. But, I totally agree that other's that can only afford to do that in a year should not be penalized. This website will not survive much longer with that business model. I would propose that after a certain number of reviews (e.g. 3 approved reviews) a member is given a free pass to view all information. Otherwise members will be encouraged to write fake reviews or withhold information. Sadly, I know I have at least four visits under my belt that I won't write a review for until my other shiit expires. SH was never like this....
My understanding is the time adds on if you have more than one approved review.
For example, if you have two approved reviews you have 8 weeks of private detail access from the point your first review was approved. Now if you get a third one approved it will extend your time out for an additinal 4 weeks and so on.
Unlike on Spa Hunters that fostered a huge number of lurkers, this gives incentive for member's review participation.
Top Jimmy said somewhere that he was considering situations where other participation may be looked at to continue private detail access too.
One thing I know for sure is a review must have private detail information in it or it will not get approved. This should eliminate all of these short and fake reviews once new members catch on that their review was never approved. For legit shops or those with limited extras just say someting simple to tha affect in the private detail section.
If you see this thread, Top Jimmy, please weigh in and provide us additional to help understand the review process.
For example, if you have two approved reviews you have 8 weeks of private detail access from the point your first review was approved. Now if you get a third one approved it will extend your time out for an additinal 4 weeks and so on.
Unlike on Spa Hunters that fostered a huge number of lurkers, this gives incentive for member's review participation.
Top Jimmy said somewhere that he was considering situations where other participation may be looked at to continue private detail access too.
One thing I know for sure is a review must have private detail information in it or it will not get approved. This should eliminate all of these short and fake reviews once new members catch on that their review was never approved. For legit shops or those with limited extras just say someting simple to tha affect in the private detail section.
If you see this thread, Top Jimmy, please weigh in and provide us additional to help understand the review process.
Wayne, I recently realized that THIS site is more conducive to lurkers than SH was.
To see ANYTHING in a SH review, you needed to have an account and be logged on. This gave the admin some level of control over douchebags and suspected LE (they're 2 different groups, I think) in that they could be booted off the site and deprived of ALL access.
On this site, ANYONE can view all the discussions, and the basic information in a review WITHOUT EVEN BEING LOGGED ON. Sure, they can't see private details, but many reviewers are putting juicy or incriminating (depending on who you are) stuff in the public area. Recently someone was banished from this site for bragging about working with LE and getting AMPs closed down. He (and all other "guests") can still read what's going on. Enough info to "get by" anyway.
To see ANYTHING in a SH review, you needed to have an account and be logged on. This gave the admin some level of control over douchebags and suspected LE (they're 2 different groups, I think) in that they could be booted off the site and deprived of ALL access.
On this site, ANYONE can view all the discussions, and the basic information in a review WITHOUT EVEN BEING LOGGED ON. Sure, they can't see private details, but many reviewers are putting juicy or incriminating (depending on who you are) stuff in the public area. Recently someone was banished from this site for bragging about working with LE and getting AMPs closed down. He (and all other "guests") can still read what's going on. Enough info to "get by" anyway.
We may want to be cautious what to report on AR because I searched Ada at JX Spa and it came out like this. See link below
https://www.ampreviews.net/index.php?threads/review-jx-spa.1250/
The acronym hj is there for anyone to see.
Think about it.
https://www.ampreviews.net/index.php?threads/review-jx-spa.1250/
The acronym hj is there for anyone to see.
Think about it.
- Status