Review: Alice at MAGFE: Petite HK Doll w/ Serious Curves

[Johnstockman]

Title: Review: Alice at MAGFE: Petite HK Doll w/ Serious Curves
Date: Dec 2, 2019
Phone: 929-390-8811
City: New York City
State: New York
Location: 28th St
Age Estimate: 28
Nationality: Chinese
Physical Description: Face: Very pretty w/ nice eyes, great smile. Body: Petite w/ Curves: Wide Hips, Great Full Ass, Perky Natural C breasts,

Click to unlock the hidden Private Details in this review

Recommendation: Yes

 

[KPopPatel]

Thank you sir for the detailed review. She sounds like a fun girl to spend time with.

 

[Parpadupal]

Thanks for adding another name to my wish list. Nice review.

 

[Johnstockman]

Thanks for adding another name to my wish list. Nice review.

My pleasure. She's a Gem.

 

[BrettKavanaugh]

Are Alice's pictures on the website remotely accurate?

 

[BrettKavanaugh]

Wow. How does Natasha keep recruiting these Korean fitness models?

 

[KPopPatel]

Wow. How does Natasha keep recruiting these Korean fitness models?

Hahaha, indeed, she has quite the hookup.

 

[The REAL Bxbrown]

Wow. How does Natasha keep recruiting these Korean fitness models?

 

[The REAL Bxbrown]

I remember back in the day when all the places used real pics and using fakes was almost a death sentence to a business, how times have changed.

 

[Johnstockman]

Wow. How does Natasha keep recruiting these Korean fitness models?

Are Alice's pictures on the website remotely accurate?

Indeed, those pics are a bit odd. One looks like a stock photo of a outrageously curvy girl. Real Alice is a curvy girl, and very attractive....but not as outrageously so as the gym princess in the stock photo, and her arms are not as skinny as that model.
The two other pics could maybe potentially be her, but don't really convey her actual appearance due to the angles etc. If I had to guess though, I would say not real.

Relievingly, however, in person she is very good looking and sexy, as myself and the previous reviewer described.

Sorry for not including this disclaimer in my review!

 

[Johnstockman]

While I've only seen one girl over at magfe (Coco and the pics are real but somewhat touched up) I really doubt this is the same Alice that was at Grace back in June. The descriptions are way off, as that Alice had very obvious enhancements that were hard and her bottom was as flat as a pancake.

Intriguing. Yeah this Alice has a very juicy round ass, to the degree that I would not rule out the possibility of her having had a butt job to get it.

 

[The REAL Bxbrown]

Intriguing. Yeah this Alice has a very juicy round ass, to the degree that I would not rule out the possibility of her having had a butt job to get it.

Hey don't toy with me! Lol. While she didn't have a pretty face I did enjoy the Alice that was on 47 street.

 

[Johnstockman]

Hey don't toy with me! Lol. While she didn't have a pretty face I did enjoy the Alice that was on 47 street.

Uh oh... what was HER ass like? And face?

 

[Poopmoop]

Sounds like they baited and switched you guys. Is this person similar to Jenny at NYAW?

 

[Johnstockman]

Sounds like they baited and switched you guys. Is this person similar to Jenny at NYAW?

I haven't seen Jenny yet.

 

[Johnstockman]

Lol hey I'm an honest guy. I never said she was hot or anything to that extent. I liked her fake rack and how serviceable she was but like I said I doubt it's the same girl.

Back to the subject at hand. I for one enjoyed John's review. I'm not a fan of the fake pics tactics and I'm just waiting for Coco to return.

Glad you enjoyed the review. I agree, it's too bad bc in this case, the hard working girl looks perfectly fine herself. I wonder sometimes if spas use stock pictures out of expediency, not realizing how much this can dampen enthusiasm for some people in some cases.

 

[Erotes]

I remember back in the day when all the places used real pics and using fakes was almost a death sentence to a business, how times have changed.

When was this?

 

[The REAL Bxbrown]

When was this?

Pre 2016

 

[Johnstockman]

When was this?

That's a very fair question as well. I prefer real pictures any day of the week, but after mongering for almost 20 years in NYC, I just don't put that much stock into the online pictures. I wish the pics were always shockingly representative, but I accept the fact that they are not.

 

[Woodguy]

Indeed, those pics are a bit odd. One looks like a stock photo of a outrageously curvy girl. Real Alice is a curvy girl, and very attractive....but not as outrageously so as the gym princess in the stock photo, and her arms are not as skinny as that model.
The two other pics could maybe potentially be her, but don't really convey her actual appearance due to the angles etc. If I had to guess though, I would say not real.

Relievingly, however, in person she is very good looking and sexy, as myself and the previous reviewer described.

Sorry for not including this disclaimer in my review!

I asked Natasha for some pictures, and she sent me some. This girl looks pretty hot! It is amazing how Natasha gets so many sexy girls to work at her place. I think I may try her out. Thanks for the recommendation