AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Review: Lovely Linda at Massage Quest

iceguy

Review Contributor
Messages: 37
Reviews: 9
Joined
#1
Title: Review: Lovely Linda at Massage Quest
Date: Jun 26, 2023
Phone: (610) 937-8147
City: Collegeville
State: PA
Location: Strip mall/ retail area

House Fee and Tip (if applicable) .6 + .8
Age Estimate: 45
Nationality: Chinese
Physical Description: In shape mom bod, very nice naturals

Recommendation: Yes
 

iceguy

Review Contributor
Messages: 37
Reviews: 9
Joined
#3
Yea, she was very accommodating....I wanted to see/ play with her wet chest in the shower room, after the TM began to heat things up.
I'll be back to see her, really wondering if I can get her to expand the menu....we did seem to hit it off. I know a lot of mongs here see her, wondering if they've had success with additional extras.
 

bs2000

Review Contributor
Messages: 506
Reviews: 45
Joined
#4
Yea, she was very accommodating....I wanted to see/ play with her wet chest in the shower room, after the TM began to heat things up.
I'll be back to see her, really wondering if I can get her to expand the menu....we did seem to hit it off. I know a lot of mongs here see her, wondering if they've had success with additional extras.
That is what PM's are for .
 

Jasong

Review Contributor
Messages: 394
Reviews: 7
Joined
#7
Reviews remain in a private area. Replies are public, I don't understand how certain geniuses can't grap that.
When challenging someones intelligence its always best to spell your insult correctly. How “private” do you think reviews are when anyone can gain access? If someone were fishing for less than friendly purposes here they would get access. The “geniuses” seem to think this is some secure site with vetted member access. The entire site is exposed to such a fisherman and theres no shortage of quarry if they wanted it. So unclench those cheeks. He didn’t do anything YOU need to correct.
 

oldhorndog53

Review Contributor
Messages: 2,755
Reviews: 23
Joined
#8
From topjimmy, site administrator and ultimate authority on this board:

“Read carefully, to avoid the possibility of losing your membership here.

The content posted in the Private Details section within every review, as well as any information shared inside one of our many new Private Access forums is sacred. This means the author of such content intended it to be privately shared among members with Private Access ONLY.

As a member here, you accept the shared responsibility of keeping that information sacred.

In other words, you will lose your membership if you ever reveal the contents of private details or a Private Forum to non-private access members. Even if you do so by accident. There will be a zero tolerance policy applied to enforcement of this guideline. In other words, it doesn’t matter who you are, how long you’ve been here, how many posts or reviews you have, or whether you did it maliciously or unintentionally....you do it, you’re gone. Period.

Avoid making this mistake in your posts.

Especially avoid using QUOTE in your posts. If you quote something, keep in mind that you might be quoting something in private details only to make it visible to the general public in your public reply. You do that, you’re gone.

Avoid asking questions about something someone posted in the private details. Avoid referencing something someone posted in the private details. In both cases, you may be revealing something indirectly . And even in that case, you’re gone.

Members take note! If you see this happen out there in the forums, REPORT IT. We have several mods now and more importantly than just banning the offending member, we have to clean up the thread.”

Although we avoid ever editing the content posted by our members in posts or reviews, this is an exception. You can bet your bottom dollar that we will edit a post to protect private information that some idiot negligently revealed.

AMPReviews members, thanks for your understanding. Please help us to implement and enforce this guideline. The best forums on the net are the ones that are self-monitored and policed by the members.”

AND

“. . .the reviewer is the only one that’s exempt from this. If he chooses to reveal something publicly that he wrote in the private details, that’s his choice and he may do so. And, once it’s revealed publicly by the reviewer, it’s no longer bound by the guidelines that protect the private content.”
 

hhnyc77

Moderator
Messages: 1,164
Reviews: 75
Joined
#9
When challenging someones intelligence its always best to spell your insult correctly. How “private” do you think reviews are when anyone can gain access? If someone were fishing for less than friendly purposes here they would get access. The “geniuses” seem to think this is some secure site with vetted member access. The entire site is exposed to such a fisherman and theres no shortage of quarry if they wanted it. So unclench those cheeks. He didn’t do anything YOU need to correct.
It's not about being a secured site...it's about encouraging membership here to write reviews and contribute intel. Because our content is what makes our site, our contributing members have earned the right to view all that content with their reviews. We don't want to let lurkers or the random public be able to view the private details without contributing themselves, which is why the system is in place. Granted, it's not a perfect system, but that's how the site operates.

It's not about locking anyone out...but we do want to save the most valuable intel for those with access. Sure, it's not THAT difficult to gain access here, but it does require contributing, which again, adds to the tons of quality content that are private.
 

Jasong

Review Contributor
Messages: 394
Reviews: 7
Joined
#11
From topjimmy, site administrator and ultimate authority on this board:

“Read carefully, to avoid the possibility of losing your membership here.

The content posted in the Private Details section within every review, as well as any information shared inside one of our many new Private Access forums is sacred. This means the author of such content intended it to be privately shared among members with Private Access ONLY.

As a member here, you accept the shared responsibility of keeping that information sacred.

In other words, you will lose your membership if you ever reveal the contents of private details or a Private Forum to non-private access members. Even if you do so by accident. There will be a zero tolerance policy applied to enforcement of this guideline. In other words, it doesn’t matter who you are, how long you’ve been here, how many posts or reviews you have, or whether you did it maliciously or unintentionally....you do it, you’re gone. Period.

Avoid making this mistake in your posts.

Especially avoid using QUOTE in your posts. If you quote something, keep in mind that you might be quoting something in private details only to make it visible to the general public in your public reply. You do that, you’re gone.

Avoid asking questions about something someone posted in the private details. Avoid referencing something someone posted in the private details. In both cases, you may be revealing something indirectly . And even in that case, you’re gone.

Members take note! If you see this happen out there in the forums, REPORT IT. We have several mods now and more importantly than just banning the offending member, we have to clean up the thread.”

Although we avoid ever editing the content posted by our members in posts or reviews, this is an exception. You can bet your bottom dollar that we will edit a post to protect private information that some idiot negligently revealed.

AMPReviews members, thanks for your understanding. Please help us to implement and enforce this guideline. The best forums on the net are the ones that are self-monitored and policed by the members.”

AND

“. . .the reviewer is the only one that’s exempt from this. If he chooses to reveal something publicly that he wrote in the private details, that’s his choice and he may do so. And, once it’s revealed publicly by the reviewer, it’s no longer bound by the guidelines that protect the private content.”
Jimmy i agree with you 100%. That said, I made no comment about the OPs review. Two things here. Setting aside that it does happen that some here who arent mods decide to tell others they cant do this or that and people are human so reactions are what they are. perhaps mods should identify themselves as mods when doing this and avoid anyone being out off. everyone cant be the sheriff right?
At the end of the day private
From topjimmy, site administrator and ultimate authority on this board:

“Read carefully, to avoid the possibility of losing your membership here.

The content posted in the Private Details section within every review, as well as any information shared inside one of our many new Private Access forums is sacred. This means the author of such content intended it to be privately shared among members with Private Access ONLY.

As a member here, you accept the shared responsibility of keeping that information sacred.

In other words, you will lose your membership if you ever reveal the contents of private details or a Private Forum to non-private access members. Even if you do so by accident. There will be a zero tolerance policy applied to enforcement of this guideline. In other words, it doesn’t matter who you are, how long you’ve been here, how many posts or reviews you have, or whether you did it maliciously or unintentionally....you do it, you’re gone. Period.

Avoid making this mistake in your posts.

Especially avoid using QUOTE in your posts. If you quote something, keep in mind that you might be quoting something in private details only to make it visible to the general public in your public reply. You do that, you’re gone.

Avoid asking questions about something someone posted in the private details. Avoid referencing something someone posted in the private details. In both cases, you may be revealing something indirectly . And even in that case, you’re gone.

Members take note! If you see this happen out there in the forums, REPORT IT. We have several mods now and more importantly than just banning the offending member, we have to clean up the thread.”

Although we avoid ever editing the content posted by our members in posts or reviews, this is an exception. You can bet your bottom dollar that we will edit a post to protect private information that some idiot negligently revealed.

AMPReviews members, thanks for your understanding. Please help us to implement and enforce this guideline. The best forums on the net are the ones that are self-monitored and policed by the members.”

AND

“. . .the reviewer is the only one that’s exempt from this. If he chooses to reveal something publicly that he wrote in the private details, that’s his choice and he may do so. And, once it’s revealed publicly by the reviewer, it’s no longer bound by the guidelines that protect the private content.”
Jimmy i agree with you 100%. That said, I made no comment about the OPs review. Two things here. Setting aside that it does happen that some here who arent mods decide to tell others they cant do this or that and people are human so reactions are what they are. Ive seen guys who arent mods throw weight around corecting people when absolutely nothing is being shared, violated or whatever but they just dont agree with the comments in a thread. Perhaps mods should identify themselves as mods when doing this and it might avoid anyone being put off. Just a suggestion. everyone cant be the sheriff right?
I absolutely agree details should be sacred! But details aren’t secure and anyone seeking them for unfriendly purposes could easily get them by writing a review.
I dont know of a solution to it but if the concern is security we have bigger problems imho.
I personally didnt think the commentor was out of line but like the guy chastising him, its not my job to decide that.
 

Jasong

Review Contributor
Messages: 394
Reviews: 7
Joined
#13
It's not about being a secured site...it's about encouraging membership here to write reviews and contribute intel. Because our content is what makes our site, our contributing members have earned the right to view all that content with their reviews. We don't want to let lurkers or the random public be able to view the private details without contributing themselves, which is why the system is in place. Granted, it's not a perfect system, but that's how the site operates.

It's not about locking anyone out...but we do want to save the most valuable intel for those with access. Sure, it's not THAT difficult to gain access here, but it does require contributing, which again, adds to the tons of quality content that are private.
I agree with you. I simply didnt think his comment was worthy of a to do and I said so. Its an ooinion. Not my call and unless youre a mod… Thats all. Calling me “genius…” wasnt necessary ergo my reply. It’s over. Moving on. Be well.
 

Jasong

Review Contributor
Messages: 394
Reviews: 7
Joined
#14
He was asking about additional extras. I assume he means other than those posted in the review. So I think that is PM information.
Fair point. Keep in mind everyone IT WAS NOT ME WHO MADE THE COMMENTS. I do not and never have shared such things in comments.
 

bs2000

Review Contributor
Messages: 506
Reviews: 45
Joined
#15
Fair point. Keep in mind everyone IT WAS NOT ME WHO MADE THE COMMENTS. I do not and never have shared such things in comments.
I, in no way, implied that you do so. I specifically mentioned additional extras in my original PM comment, and you replied seemingly to dispute the appropriateness of my concern. This facility has already lost one of its finest providers because of the knowledge and word of additional extras that spread, ultimately to management. And yes, this is probably selfish on my part, but I think my concern about PM's has been voiced by many and I felt it was approriate to do so again for not only this facility, but all. YMMV is the law of this hobby. And just like Dirty Harry said, If you want a gurantee, buy a toaster.
 

coma69toast

Review Contributor
Messages: 684
Reviews: 53
Joined
#16
This facility has already lost one of its finest providers because of the knowledge and word of additional extras that spread, ultimately to management.
Any idea where she ended up? I thought I remembered reading something on here, but looking back can't find anything incriminating. Bold move getting rid of the main draw.
 

bs2000

Review Contributor
Messages: 506
Reviews: 45
Joined
#17
Any idea where she ended up? I thought I remembered reading something on here, but looking back can't find anything incriminating. Bold move getting rid of the main draw.
I don't know where she is, but still in the US. We text infrequently but I have not asked nor has she told me.
 

Jasong

Review Contributor
Messages: 394
Reviews: 7
Joined
#18
I, in no way, implied that you do so. I specifically mentioned additional extras in my original PM comment, and you replied seemingly to dispute the appropriateness of my concern. This facility has already lost one of its finest providers because of the knowledge and word of additional extras that spread, ultimately to management. And yes, this is probably selfish on my part, but I think my concern about PM's has been voiced by many and I felt it was approriate to do so again for not only this facility, but all. YMMV is the law of this hobby. And just like Dirty Harry said, If you want a gurantee, buy a toaster.
We are good. But i still think some are wringing hands over torn window screens when the doors are all open. but its neither here nor there really. Not my call or yours how others act as far as I know..,.,:
I abide by the rules set by our host. Period.
 

bs2000

Review Contributor
Messages: 506
Reviews: 45
Joined
#19
We are good. But i still think some are wringing hands over torn window screens when the doors are all open. but its neither here nor there really. Not my call or yours how others act as far as I know..,.,:
I abide by the rules set by our host. Period.
It seems like you and I are really trying to agree. But, as you have seen in the recent past, some of the longer longevity and more esteemed members on this site have had a dramatic impact, not favorable IMHO, on the expectations and attitudes of not only the nobbyists but also the providers. You are right, it is not our call as to how others act on this site, but when it is a concern that affects all memebers, especially newbees, it is incumbent upon those who have an informed opinion, unfortunateely mostly garnered from bad experiences, to express that opinion also for the good of all. The silent majority also has a voice . Nuff said, Cheers,
.
 
Top