Review: Porn star... Worth it?? Zoey Reyes

[Uniquelyme]

Title: Review: Porn star... Worth it?? Zoey Reyes
Date: Jul 12, 2020
Phone: 917-342-4255
City: New York
State: NY
Location: Midtown
Age Estimate: 23
Nationality: Latina
Physical Description: Tall, some curves.. A phatty

Click to unlock the hidden Private Details in this review

Recommendation: No

 

[takeya201]

Hmm i don’t think it’s the first time I’ve read about her smell/scent from the south end.

 

[Uniquelyme]

Hmm i don’t think it’s the first time I’ve read about her smell/scent from the south end.

i specifically said keep that in private details. But since you are starting this off. Like I said, it didn't smell fishy. Like diet wise maybe. I still was able to keep going. Just was commenting for other ppl who are curious about her.

 

[Gweiz024]

Man, imo, she looks ugly... 3/10

 

[Uniquelyme]

Man, imo, she looks ugly... 3/10

You seen her? That's harsh damn.

 

[Gweiz024]

You seen her? That's harsh damn.

Haven’t seen her. Googled her pictures and...3 might be lenient.

 

[Gweiz024]

Meanwhile, great review as always !

 

[AutomaticSlim]

Just personal taste.

Listen I'm not trying to pick on you, so I don't want you to get that impression.
I've seen Zoey's pics for a while. She's been at Lear in the past in addition to DD. And maybe at the old GC too, but I cannot confirm that.
She's not a 3. She's certainly not my type, but definintely higher than a 3.
The reason I bring this up is because from your reviews you seem to go with women in their 40s and even in their 50s (!).
To me a woman in her 50s is by default starting at about a 4 (at best) and can only go lower. And you've recommended them!
So yeah, it's all relative.
But still...

 

[takeya201]

I apologize, i was speed reading a bit and didn’t realize that was the bit to not mention and found out i can’t edit my post quick enough.

She’s definitely not what i would label a 3/10, her face is way more attractive than that judging from a few videos I skimmed.

 

[Gweiz024]

Listen I'm not trying to pick on you, so I don't want you to get that impression.
I've seen Zoey's pics for a while. She's been at Lear in the past in addition to DD. And maybe at the old GC too, but I cannot confirm that.
She's not a 3. She's certainly not my type, but definintely higher than a 3.
The reason I bring this up is because from your reviews you seem to go with women in their 40s and even in their 50s (!).
To me a woman in her 50s is by default starting at about a 4 (at best) and can only go lower. And you've recommended them!
So yeah, it's all relative.
But still...

Yeah I would go for 40s or even 50s if they take good care of themselves and they know how to be sexy. For this particular chick, it's personal taste of her face.

 

[Jdub42]

Man, imo, she looks ugly... 3/10

I've seen her videos and social media. But I personally dont think she's ugly, to each his own. Won't likely see her anyways due to the information above. I've never ran into that kind of issue from any provider at DD, most recently saw Michelle a few weeks ago.

 

[Uniquelyme]

I've seen her videos and social media. But I personally dont think she's ugly, to each his own. Won't likely see her anyways due to the information above. I've never ran into that kind of issue from any provider at DD, most recently saw Michelle a few weeks ago.

Did you review her?? I don't think you did. A review would be nice..

 

[PeoplesChamp2356]

I feel like she has a very unique pretty look with a giant nice ass. I had a session with her a while back before I joined this site. I think worth a go around once. But I Also would not repeat. Cause she was more LFK (prob not even LFK now due to COVID). But if you haven’t tried a session with her personally it’s fun to do once as a porn star at that price point is rare.

 

[rigandine]

Listen I'm not trying to pick on you, so I don't want you to get that impression.
I've seen Zoey's pics for a while. She's been at Lear in the past in addition to DD. And maybe at the old GC too, but I cannot confirm that.
She's not a 3. She's certainly not my type, but definintely higher than a 3.
The reason I bring this up is because from your reviews you seem to go with women in their 40s and even in their 50s (!).
To me a woman in her 50s is by default starting at about a 4 (at best) and can only go lower. And you've recommended them!
So yeah, it's all relative.
But still...

slim is right. i rate on a extremely strict scale and she is a solid 6. she is just slightly above average.

 

[Jdub42]

Did you review her?? I don't think you did. A review would be nice..

I didn't yet. I'll post one sometime today.

 

[pyt0109]

Its 200 for an hour?