-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Review: Review DaDaDa - Tina
- Thread starter capedude
- Start date
Mr. Chan there were details. Sorry, that's just fact from what you wrote. Details don't need to necessarily state that "girl xyz did this to me". It is very easy to know what took place in your encounter unless the person reading it is just stupid.
Secondly, why not just post a review rather than respond with details. I am simply stating that the rules of this site seem very very very skewed from the short time I have been signed up. We are not supposed to put graphic details in the public section of a review yet I have seen plenty graphic details in responses on threads.
Secondly, why not just post a review rather than respond with details. I am simply stating that the rules of this site seem very very very skewed from the short time I have been signed up. We are not supposed to put graphic details in the public section of a review yet I have seen plenty graphic details in responses on threads.
I went once to see her at 9:00AM on a Sunday morning. She walks in the room and I am just overjoyed with the first impressions. A regular must have come in because I am naked, waiting for a trip to the TS and another provider comes in as a "fill in actress". That session was with Cici and it went for over 90 minutes. I am pretty sure she does not match the award winning performance of Tina, but it was a wonderful fill in performance I will not forget.
I don’t think his comments were too graphic and are helpful which is the original purpose of this board. It seems this board is becoming more of a “private club” of insiders than the free sharing of information so we can all make informed decisions. I understand the rule that private details be reserved to active members but even public details are now being withheld in some reviews (I’m not referring to the confidentiality requirement of EPM) and comments that only vaguely reference private activities or details are being complained about. It seems this board is designed to help only those hobbyists whose discretionary income allows monthly visits or those who choose to write fake reviews to gain acces. That leaves a lot of members with good reputations and who have made contributions in the past, in the dark
