AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Review: Tori @ PH

Ampguy80

Registered Member
Messages: 463
Reviews: 20
Joined
#2
I am not sure that I like the restricted positions. I think another review said that too. I am sure my D is fine for her but if she doesn’t position herself so I can have full range of motion I would hate it.
 

Zzzz

V for Veblen
Messages: 709
Reviews: 9
Joined
#6
Title: Review: Tori @ PH
Date: Aug 12, 2020
Phone: 347-654-8431
City: ny
State: ny
Location: midtown
Age Estimate: late 30's
Nationality: Korean
Physical Description: just like pics

Recommendation: Yes
I suspect this wasn't actually a size issue. It would be counter-intuitive for Tori to reject CG, a position that would have allowed her greater control of both the depth and speed, if size was the issue.

And given you were her first appointment of the day, then she shouldn't have been too exhausted for CG.
 

Chiller

Review Contributor
Messages: 601
Reviews: 35
Joined
#8
It would be counter-intuitive for Tori to reject CG, a position that would have allowed her greater control of both the depth and speed, if size was the issue.
While this hypothesis makes sense in the abstract, in practice I had one provider who was quite thin in the waist and hips tell me she could not do CG because it would be painful. She was happy to do mish and IIRC standing doggie. Only saw her once so I never had the opportunity to develop a rapport to explore the physicality issues but obvs had no reason to doubt her.
 

Zzzz

V for Veblen
Messages: 709
Reviews: 9
Joined
#9
While this hypothesis makes sense in the abstract, in practice I had one provider who was quite thin in the waist and hips tell me she could not do CG because it would be painful. She was happy to do mish and IIRC standing doggie. Only saw her once so I never had the opportunity to develop a rapport to explore the physicality issues but obvs had no reason to doubt her.
Are you sure it wasn't ACG? With CG, the gal can always lean forward to have greater control over depth. Certainly, if she's hovering perpendicular to a cock, then she could slip and inadvertently take it in too deep.
 

Chiller

Review Contributor
Messages: 601
Reviews: 35
Joined
#10
Good question but we didnt even get close to that distinction. She seemed sincere, so who am I to judge?

Are you sure it wasn't ACG? With CG, the gal can always lean forward to have greater control over depth. Certainly, if she's hovering perpendicular to a cock, then she could slip and inadvertently take it in too deep.
 

therealest

Registered Member
Messages: 273
Reviews: 13
Joined
#11
different strokes for different folks. she may just have a type or preference that makes her feel comfortable. maybe she was just out of it because she just woke up. she told me she hates ugly looking and cone shape pointy dicks. mine was just a little to fulfilling for her comfort. i had smaller girls here (yoyo and pinky for example) with no problem. at the end of the day, its ymmv with tori.
 
Top