AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Ivy - SL

Zippy17

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,003
Reviews: 26
Joined
#4
Great photos. Unfortunately, confirmed not really her. More guys should always ask first, and repeat the question as many times as it takes to get a direct response, instead of all the usual responses to other questions you haven't asked. If more guys asked first and then let these places know they don't book based on descriptions or promises unless they can see real pictures, they'd stop doing it. They can always post blurred or partial photos to maintain the girls' anonymity, but almost any real photo is worth a lot more than photos of an entirely different person. Fuck that.
 

JuicyApp

Review Contributor
Messages: 106
Reviews: 9
Joined
#5
Great photos. Unfortunately, confirmed not really her. More guys should always ask first, and repeat the question as many times as it takes to get a direct response, instead of all the usual responses to other questions you haven't asked. If more guys asked first and then let these places know they don't book based on descriptions or promises unless they can see real pictures, they'd stop doing it. They can always post blurred or partial photos to maintain the girls' anonymity, but almost any real photo is worth a lot more than photos of an entirely different person. Fuck that.
I know they touch up the photos a lil, but if she looks ANYTHING like that, and has good service, still a dub in my book
 

Zippy17

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,003
Reviews: 26
Joined
#8
Damn lol, how bad did she look?
I didn't see her...I just asked the shop if she's really the girl in the photos. They said she's beautiful and great performance and feedback, yada yada...so I said that all of their girls are beautiful, but there are plenty of beautiful girls I'm just not interested in seeing...so I never book without real photos. I don't give a shit about performance if I'm not that attracted to the girl and we all know that all of us define "beauty" for ourselves when it comes to deciding which beautiful girls we want to see for $400/hr and which beautiful girls don't really interest us...
 

JuicyApp

Review Contributor
Messages: 106
Reviews: 9
Joined
#9
I didn't see her...I just asked the shop if she's really the girl in the photos. They said she's beautiful and great performance and feedback, yada yada...so I said that all of their girls are beautiful, but there are plenty of beautiful girls I'm just not interested in seeing...so I never book without real photos. I don't give a shit about performance if I'm not that attracted to the girl and we all know that all of us define "beauty" for ourselves when it comes to deciding which beautiful girls we want to see for $400/hr and which beautiful girls don't really interest us...
Maybe I got lower standards than you, but she has potential IMO if she looks ANYTHING like that. Plus I saw another review about how she served and it seemed to check off the boxes on what (Borat voice) I LIKE
 

Zippy17

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,003
Reviews: 26
Joined
#10
Maybe I got lower standards than you, but she has potential IMO if she looks ANYTHING like that. Plus I saw another review about how she served and it seemed to check off the boxes on what (Borat voice) I LIKE
If this is your response to what you just quoted, you either didn't actually read it or you didn't understand it. It's not about more beautiful or less beautiful or about "standards"; it's about all of us liking different things even among a group of women who (let's agree for argument's sake) are ALL obviously "beautiful" in general. You might have no interest in some of my favorite girls who are perfect for me. I just don't trust anybody else to decide for me which photos of OTHER girls accurately represent what a girl with no real photos will look like to ME in person and I never want to go to any spa because I liked the girl in their photos, only to find myself in a room with anybody besides the exact girl whose photos they posted. Sometimes, I can't even be sure from a girl's REAL photos, but that's on me if I guessed wrong. Demanding real photos (even blurred or partial photos) of the girl you're actually booking in this industry really shouldn't need any kind of justification or this much explanation. I think this is going to be my last try to explain it to you as clearly and as simply as possible. Peace.
 

JuicyApp

Review Contributor
Messages: 106
Reviews: 9
Joined
#11
Maybe I got lower standards than you, but she has potential IMO if she looks ANYTHING like that. Plus I saw another review about how she served and it seemed to check off the boxes on what (Borat voice) I LIKE
IMO = In My Opinion

I Like = Not what you like

We're basically saying the same thing...Hasta Luego bro
 

Tarpon

Review Contributor
Messages: 936
Reviews: 21
Joined
#12
"Touched up" is fine; totally different person is not acceptable.
Different person is the norm nowadays, the houses don't care. It is standard.

Now you can use a similar pic, indicative pic, representative pic.....but like you say everyone has a type. An 8 isnt always an 8.

Or you can blur out the face and PS the body....

Touched up can be useless depending on how much. You can have a 6 face who i wud not pay to see, and touch her up to an 8 face. That doesnt help me either.
 

Johnny Blaze

YMMV Intercontinental Champion
Messages: 3,089
Reviews: 189
Joined
#13
I didn't see her...I just asked the shop if she's really the girl in the photos. They said she's beautiful and great performance and feedback, yada yada...so I said that all of their girls are beautiful, but there are plenty of beautiful girls I'm just not interested in seeing...so I never book without real photos. I don't give a shit about performance if I'm not that attracted to the girl and we all know that all of us define "beauty" for ourselves when it comes to deciding which beautiful girls we want to see for $400/hr and which beautiful girls don't really interest us...
She has the tattoos. Probably her touched up but no idea how accurate because I keep seeing her from the side wearing a towel.
She has been busy every time I tried to get a look at her.
 

cher_cheri

Je ne regrette rien
Messages: 2,204
Reviews: 88
Joined
#14
Fake photos is not the standard. There are lots of girls with real, if touched up photos. Some aren't even touched up. Have a look at the pics of Rei at RS8. That's exactly what she looks like, except she's a bit prettier IRL. But at XoXo all of the photos of C-girls are fake - one had photos of three (!) different woman. Most of the SL/DDY photos are real, though faces are usually modified enough so you can't learn much.
 

Tarpon

Review Contributor
Messages: 936
Reviews: 21
Joined
#16
Thanks. What's annoying AF is that not a single one of those guys keeping her so busy has bothered to drop a fucking review.
Looking at your last 6 months of reviews your average posting time is more than a week after the date.

I get it, its called gatekeeping.
 

Zippy17

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,003
Reviews: 26
Joined
#17
Looking at your last 6 months of reviews your average posting time is more than a week after the date. I get it, its called gatekeeping.
And this is called an erroneous conclusion based on a very narrow a-priori assumption, because that would be the only reason to actually check the dates of my reviews. I tend to procrastinate about many things, and while there are some things important enough for me to try to procrastinate about less, publicly reviewing escorts just isn't one of them. My reviews also tend to be much more detailed (and helpful) than many; so I get around to them when I have the time and when I'm in the mood. I'm not as interested in defending against this accusation as you probably are in doubling down on it, but if you want to waste more of your time on the details of my review dates, I believe you'll also find some that I posted within hours or a day or two after seeing a girl I reviewed very highly. There have also been plenty of times when I chimed in to discussions to confirm that I thought a particular girl was awesome before I ever got around to reviewing her myself. My last review was of SE Rosie and she thanked me, because she immediately noticed the increase in her bookings right after I posted it. TBH, (which I always am on here), the only reason I wrote that one when I did instead of later was that I knew my private access balance was down to a couple of days. If I wanted to "gate-keep" I'd never have posted that kind of review knowing she'd be here for another month at the time. Naturally, you'll ignore all of the above, simply because it contradicts the conclusion that your were obvioulsy hoping to confirm when you decided to pull up my entire review history, in the first place.
 

Tarpon

Review Contributor
Messages: 936
Reviews: 21
Joined
#18
And this is called an erroneous conclusion based on a very narrow a-priori assumption, because that would be the only reason to actually check the dates of my reviews. I tend to procrastinate about many things, and while there are some things important enough for me to try to procrastinate about less, publicly reviewing escorts just isn't one of them. My reviews also tend to be much more detailed (and helpful) than many; so I get around to them when I have the time and when I'm in the mood. I'm not as interested in defending against this accusation as you probably are in doubling down on it, but if you want to waste more of your time on the details of my review dates, I believe you'll also find some that I posted within hours or a day or two after seeing a girl I reviewed very highly. There have also been plenty of times when I chimed in to discussions to confirm that I thought a particular girl was awesome before I ever got around to reviewing her myself. My last review was of SE Rosie and she thanked me, because she immediately noticed the increase in her bookings right after I posted it. TBH, (which I always am on here), the only reason I wrote that one when I did instead of later was that I knew my private access balance was down to a couple of days. If I wanted to "gate-keep" I'd never have posted that kind of review knowing she'd be here for another month at the time. Naturally, you'll ignore all of the above, simply because it contradicts the conclusion that your were obvioulsy hoping to confirm when you decided to pull up my entire review history, in the first place.
Took me less than 60 seconds to do the math. But yes i agree with you entirely on the above. And no, I wasnt referring to you doing the gatekeeping. Thanks buddy.
 

Johnny Blaze

YMMV Intercontinental Champion
Messages: 3,089
Reviews: 189
Joined
#19
Thanks. What's annoying AF is that not a single one of those guys keeping her so busy has bothered to drop a fucking review.
Most people do not write reviews and most customers are regulars.
The latinas tend to get reviewed less than Asians.

I saw DDY violet in the hall before and she is really cute.

Gabriella is on her period so still haven't looked at her.
 

Jpnt

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,568
Reviews: 47
Joined
#20
i really wish we would start a collective action to demand that these places use only real, unretouched photos (except for a black bar over eyes) or we don’t book. If we did a No Fuckee Friday, they’d get the message.
 
Top