-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
LSC Diya
- Thread starter KGirlLover
- Start date
Diya's pics look like the usual poor quality ones that she brought with her from Korea. No naked tits or derriere, no falling off lingerie, or come fuck me, pics. The pics aren't as racy as the latest instagram pics, that are ads for Onlyfans fuck videos.
I think most of us would like to see what her D tits and booty look like.
Even in her nurses costume she doesn't seem very happy (or in any pics) which means she probably doesn't get it, and probably very green. I don't know if these girls are taking the pics themselves or going to some bad photographer. But it's easy to look at korg website pics to get what is preferable. It's as if they are aiming the pics for the most modest market.
My other complaint is that the Korean objective of makeup is to all look the same as the ideal young Korean or to wear none if you don't need it. While the American notion of makeup is to wear makeup appropriate for face, race, hair and for situation, school, work, casual, nitelife, etc. It's common for korean providers after a year here, to start wearing big eye makeup, long false eyelashes, eyeliner, etc. which make them sexier looking, and which usually don't get disturbed in session. Eye makeup is like part of a sex costume, like lingerie, string bikinis, etc.
I think most of us would like to see what her D tits and booty look like.
Even in her nurses costume she doesn't seem very happy (or in any pics) which means she probably doesn't get it, and probably very green. I don't know if these girls are taking the pics themselves or going to some bad photographer. But it's easy to look at korg website pics to get what is preferable. It's as if they are aiming the pics for the most modest market.
My other complaint is that the Korean objective of makeup is to all look the same as the ideal young Korean or to wear none if you don't need it. While the American notion of makeup is to wear makeup appropriate for face, race, hair and for situation, school, work, casual, nitelife, etc. It's common for korean providers after a year here, to start wearing big eye makeup, long false eyelashes, eyeliner, etc. which make them sexier looking, and which usually don't get disturbed in session. Eye makeup is like part of a sex costume, like lingerie, string bikinis, etc.
I wish they would let regulars look preview roomates. Normally, it's a big no no, but I think it might actually improve bookings. The monger has an image in their mind of a real girl, he knows will have sex with. I find that I tend to want to next see the provider that's rattling around in my head.
Last time seeing SKS Sophia, you could hear returning Joah making sounds. Sophia seemed to think it was wrong and we shouldn't listen, but I think it's really hot, helps to get the engine going. So, now I'm thinking I should see Joah again after seeing her once in March 2022. I didn't repeat because she wasn't multi-orgasmic, tiring after extended sex and I didn't connect well. But usually these things get better with experience. I'm also reconsidering seeing Baby Cherry for same reason.
Last time seeing SKS Sophia, you could hear returning Joah making sounds. Sophia seemed to think it was wrong and we shouldn't listen, but I think it's really hot, helps to get the engine going. So, now I'm thinking I should see Joah again after seeing her once in March 2022. I didn't repeat because she wasn't multi-orgasmic, tiring after extended sex and I didn't connect well. But usually these things get better with experience. I'm also reconsidering seeing Baby Cherry for same reason.
The reviewer on TER is more optimistic than most. He also praises the PO not only in Diya's review but in about half of reviews. Why? This immediately makes his review suspect. Maybe he got pussy whipped by PO for writing a less than stellar review, threatened to get ignored by PO. Notably, he rates Leedia very highly, and that she looks like pics. Notably, most of his reviews are very good, more positive than others. What happened to his bad reviews?
I saw Leedia at LSC when the PO asked for feedack. I complained that she looked 10+ years older than her pics which wasn't typical for LSC even if pics were representational. Although her body was good and service good, her attitude was bad. Shortly thereafter Leedia had moved on. So, I suspect PO got a lot of complaints and low repeat rate for Leedia, so encouraged her to go elsewhere.
I don't think the reviewer is a shill, but his review isn't that useful to rest of us. I have a whole thing about why revues are shill like. Part of it is writing bias - mostly good experiences are written, bad ones aren't. Also, many mongers, especially the tech nerds (I are one) have been conditioned by culture not to say anything negative about a woman. "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all." And more...
I saw Leedia at LSC when the PO asked for feedack. I complained that she looked 10+ years older than her pics which wasn't typical for LSC even if pics were representational. Although her body was good and service good, her attitude was bad. Shortly thereafter Leedia had moved on. So, I suspect PO got a lot of complaints and low repeat rate for Leedia, so encouraged her to go elsewhere.
I don't think the reviewer is a shill, but his review isn't that useful to rest of us. I have a whole thing about why revues are shill like. Part of it is writing bias - mostly good experiences are written, bad ones aren't. Also, many mongers, especially the tech nerds (I are one) have been conditioned by culture not to say anything negative about a woman. "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all." And more...
I'm always skeptical of first very positive reviews. I see a lot of new providers start out that way, then after half dozen reviews, the ratings go down. We will see where Diya winds up after 10 reviews.
Considering it's LSC, they aren't org shills. I'm not sure why this occurs. But first tofts have high expectations that the provider will be good, and seem to want to validate that in review. There is the excitement of having sex with new girl which increases the sexual experience causing overlooking faults.
It's clear that great service drives up looks rating. Or, for techies, looks and service correlate. Rarely is their more than 2 rating points difference. Also, because it's a lot of work many guys don't put any effort into accurate rating, but just mark looks and service high to avoid dissing, then marking up or down a point if looks or service are exceptional or worse than usual. If you look. a mongers rating history on TER, you can see these effects.
Many mongers are unaware of wide range of body types that are sexually attractive, partly because what is attractive is usually unconscious. Although if something about a body is unattractive, like butt too big or shape if tits, usually it's easy to describe why.
It's the overall attraction is difficult to identify all the working elements unless experienced like cosmetician. Like if a certain face is really attractive to you, can you describe what about it makes it more attractive than another model face?
These are all the reasons the best way is to compare with known providers. I do this sometime in reviews.
Considering it's LSC, they aren't org shills. I'm not sure why this occurs. But first tofts have high expectations that the provider will be good, and seem to want to validate that in review. There is the excitement of having sex with new girl which increases the sexual experience causing overlooking faults.
It's clear that great service drives up looks rating. Or, for techies, looks and service correlate. Rarely is their more than 2 rating points difference. Also, because it's a lot of work many guys don't put any effort into accurate rating, but just mark looks and service high to avoid dissing, then marking up or down a point if looks or service are exceptional or worse than usual. If you look. a mongers rating history on TER, you can see these effects.
Many mongers are unaware of wide range of body types that are sexually attractive, partly because what is attractive is usually unconscious. Although if something about a body is unattractive, like butt too big or shape if tits, usually it's easy to describe why.
It's the overall attraction is difficult to identify all the working elements unless experienced like cosmetician. Like if a certain face is really attractive to you, can you describe what about it makes it more attractive than another model face?
These are all the reasons the best way is to compare with known providers. I do this sometime in reviews.
Diya is 100% the girl in the pics with a little PS. I thought her face was much prettier in person than her website pics. A bit of a LKS Seoyeon look to her face, imo. Pic with her standing with arms up is a pretty good view of her body. Not a spinner in my book but slender. A little soft baby fat in the mid with a tattoo covering a scar (feather with the word "Love" at the end. Looks OK. Pretty nice MM tits. Dark nips. They spill out to the side a bit when she is on her back. VERY NICE ASS! Reminded me a lot of Demi's ass. Nicely shaped round and bouncy. Thank the Universe that she loved DATO. Very good newbie service. She aims to please. She moves to the head of the LSC class for me for now.