Review: CA Stacy

[Susanlixxx]

Title: Review: CA Stacy
Date: Mar 15, 2024
Phone: 408-797-8536
City: San Jose
State: California
Location: San Jose
House Fee & Tip (if applicable) 280 one pop
Nationality: Korean
Age Estimate: 32
Physical Description: Stacey is the girl in the photos, though aged by about five to seven years. She is not thicker than the photos. Her facial skin is not as smooth on closer inspection but she is a beautiful creature.

Click to unlock the hidden Private Details in this review

Recommendation: Yes

 

[Djanssen1]

Is CA +$.4 MSOG now for all girls or just select few? Pretty common trend in SoCal.

 

[Susanlixxx]

Select few

 

[zekyll]

Is CA +$.4 MSOG now for all girls or just select few? Pretty common trend in SoCal.

This is Stacy’s price when she worked in San Mateo too.

 

[Juanjr650]

Title: Review: CA Stacy
Date: Mar 15, 2024
Phone: 408-797-8536
City: San Jose
State: California
Location: San Jose
House Fee & Tip (if applicable) 280 one pop
Nationality: Korean
Age Estimate: 32
Physical Description: Stacey is the girl in the photos, though aged by about five to seven years. She is not thicker than the photos. Her facial skin is not as smooth on closer inspection but she is a beautiful creature.

Recommendation: Yes

I mean her body is in great shape (very sexy) but her face doesn't look like it's in her early 30s. For me at least she seems much older than pics. Amazing service and very engaging. But who wants to pay premiums for older ladies? I know it's the reason I haven't repeated. Younger eye candy girls IDGAF, I will pay premiums all day, Stacy doesn't qualify IMHO. Actually recommend if you don't mind milfy types at least once.

 

[Aro]

It varies. For that specific question. For many reason. Yes and no.