Review: CC Was a "CC Rider" at Sesame 54 Today

[Nikki Sixx]

Title: Review: CC Was a "CC Rider" at Sesame 54 Today
Date: Apr 16, 2024
Phone: 215-361-0772
City: Lansdale
State: PA
Location: Broad St. Located in a Strip Center
House Fee & Tip (if applicable) 70 House (Tipped $150)
Nationality: Korean
Age Estimate: 30's
Physical Description: Really Pretty Face, Natural C cups, Long (Mid-Back) Brown Hair, Short, Reasonably Slim

Click to unlock the hidden Private Details in this review

Recommendation: Yes

 

[Wayne1250]

You and Houston crack me up.

 

[Jnj041]

You and Houston crack me up.

Housixx advertising.org

 

[jim_hatez]

Pardon the interruption... but just so you know I personally approved this review.

I know there has been some banter back and forth regarding OP and his reviews of S54, I was even involved in some of it (personally not an Emma fan, because I felt her age was massively understated)

His review meets requirements and thus was approved. While past history would indicate taking the review with a grain of salt, he doesn't deserve to be bashed every time he makes a post, so let's please try to be civil and keep the thread on the proper track.

...that said, if the next few CC reviews pop in and mongers are saying she's 60+, then that will be an issue and we will take action, as we want all intel to be as actionable and accurate as possible. Any reviewer who repeatedly posts incorrect or untrue information about their sessions will face disciplinary action up to and including a permanent ban from the site.

The mods are on the same page on this. Any questions you can DM me.

Thanks,

jh

 

[Berrymycoknher]

IMHO everyone at sesame 54 is 50+ possibly 55+

 

[Dodgeram44]

IMHO everyone at sesame 54 is 50+ possibly 55+

Actually I was told by a reliable source that Sesame 54 only hires girls that are leap year babies and asian women moisturize nightly so relax everybody.
I saw Emma 1x & maybe she is 55+ but that tiny ass & natty top were nice. I wasn't a fan of the plastic face but that's me. There's way to many reviews of fat & terrible boob jobs & lousy attitudes on this site so can't we all get along.

 

[Jnj041]

Actually I was told by a reliable source that Sesame 54 only hires girls that are leap year babies and asian women moisturize nightly so relax everybody.
I saw Emma 1x & maybe she is 55+ but that tiny ass & natty top were nice. I wasn't a fan of the plastic face but that's me. There's way to many reviews of fat & terrible boob jobs & lousy attitudes on this site so can't we all get along.

In my opinion there's really never been a problem with s54 as far as the facilities, the ladies, or the service that you get. I am also a big fan of Emma's cute little butt. I think the problem everybody has is the exaggerated advertisements. I personally have nothing against a mid-40s or late 40s beautiful lady. I think that is The Sweet spot in service. Solution is just accurately describe your experience. Problem solved.

 

[jim_hatez]

In my opinion there's really never been a problem with s54 as far as the facilities, the ladies, or the service that you get. I am also a big fan of Emma's cute little butt. I think the problem everybody has is the exaggerated advertisements. I personally have nothing against a mid-40s or late 40s beautiful lady. I think that is The Sweet spot in service. Solution is just accurately describe your experience. Problem solved.

Everyone has different perceptions of age, and I bet few of us get the ages exactly right. And plenty of mongers don't want younger women exclusively, so reviews of all ages of providers are welcome and good for this board.

But, again, this is about trends. If every review under-estimates by 2 decades according to several other opinions, then our job is too say something (which I did). I wouldn't view it as a "warning" necessarily, more like as I said a PSA just to let you know we're keeping an eye on this issue.

The goal of reviews is always to provide the most accurate and most actionable intel to our membership. What makes a review good (outside of the necessary details outlined in the requirements)?

We may all have opinions on that, but most of us will agree it's something like this. You read the review, you get a solid idea of everything you need to repeat the experience if that experience speaks to you or conversely you decide it's worth avoiding and you do, saving your hobby money for a better time. And while YMMV is real, certain things shouldn't be YMMV like objective looks details, what your donation was, the activities you partook in, and your perception of attitude and service (which I get is more opinion but still those nuances when delivered honestly and with integrity are super helpful).

Not trying to beat a dead horse but what I don't want is folks attacking reviewers or disparaging their reviews. That discourages others from sharing intel which ultimately is not good for the board either.

It's a balancing act for sure. IMHO this review is not "over the top". And it met requirements and thus was approved.

That said... if the next 2 reviews of CC say she is almost 60, then corrective action will be taken.

Back to your regularly scheduled program lmao.

Thanks,

jh

 

[Wayne1250]

Jim, I think the problem that members see is not about the content of the review. It's not even about the age disparity. This spa has several consistent reviews that have only reviewed this spa. I think, because of this, some guys tend to question the actual validity of the reviews. What's even more amusing that under different user names on other sites, this spa is getting reviewed almost all the time by customers that also have only reviews posted for this spa.

I'm not sure there is anything wrong with this, it's just a fact. In fact, it really doesn't break any of this sites rules.

 

[jim_hatez]

That's the bottom line right? It's not breaking any written rules, true, however, integrity of info is an "unwritten" rule but one that is quite important... I believe the reason why the age thing is an issue is because looks/age are the #1 thing mongers look for in this hobby overall. Sure there are some guys who will have a session with a troll if the troll has mad skills. It takes all types. I'm just speaking overall. If you put in a review that she is 30 and smoking hot etc and she is actually 55+, your review lacks integrity. Despite it meets standards "for approval". It has to be this way, because, we have no way of knowing if your description of looks or service is accurate unless we saw the same person. We have to give you the benefit of the doubt. And thus we do..... until a totality of the evidence causes us to question the poster's integrity.

This is just opinion, so please don't take this comment as a rule, but I don't get bothered if someone only reviews 1 place. It is possible some guys like chocolate milk and they want to get chocolate milk every time they go. That's OK. Plenty of people also post their reviews on diff sites. As someone who uses the same handle, I've seen you do that yourself in the past. Also totally fine and not against any rules.

That said, this commentary happens to be here but it is not just about Nikki Sixx reviews, we expect best recollection of reality, and true feedback... as true as it can be. We all have bias, but when writing we should try to keep it to a minimum. But overall have fun, try to help others with the good, bad, and ugly.

As I mentioned, we're looking at trends here. Nobody is gonna be in trouble for being off on an age or giving an over the top review here and there. If that is consistent behavior over time though, and we will do our best to correct the behavior. Please do not read this as any kind of threat implied or otherwise. That is not what I mean. I simply mean working with the person and trying to get their contributions on track so they are as helpful as possible to the most number of people.

Of course, if "honey" doesn't work, there is always vinegar, but our goal is to avoid that except in the absolute most egregious circumstances.

 

[Nikki Sixx]

Some of you Guys post constantly, and seem to lie-in-wait to attack. You post much more than I do about the very Spa you suggest I make up shit about. Yet you never write reviews yourself, just attack mine. None of you ever saw CC, yet you will proudly say "everyone at Sesame 54 is over 50 or 55". Utter nonsense and Bullshit.

Since age has already been bandiied about in my review, and I'm the only guy on record who has actually seen CC... I don't know her age. She is 30-something, that's the best I got. 37 if I had to guess, and my life depended on being exactly right. You guys always seem to ignore service, it's always age. Fuck, the Spa World has almost nobody younger than 45, a 37 (?) Year old really gets your typewriters flowing. I don't care how old she (or anyone) is, I do care a lot about service, which is why I don't venture to other spots. It is disappointing those rare times I did.

 

[jim_hatez]

Posting a lot isn't the issue though. It's the content of the posts that matters.

That said, I think I was clear here, but to re-cap I said I don't want people attacking others for their reviews (and that includes you). The field is "age estimate" and while you and I disagree on how old Emma appears for example, that doesn't make your opinion wrong, or right for that matter. It's an opinion after all. And in this case, your post isn't about Emma. And as you correctly said, there are no other reviews on CC, and I haven't seen CC, and neither has anyone else on this thread that has claimed it. So for anyone to shitpost about the age estimate when so far there are no other reviews of that person, is premature, and unfair. That's why I posted what I did, if I didn't articulate that clearly earlier I hope this tightens it up.

So... in sum. If they wish to be skeptical of your review due to under-estimations they believe occurred in the past, that's their right. But, they can't come in and bash every review you do either. That's not gonna fly with me or the other mods.

Hopefully there won't be subsequent reviews that are the opposite of what you've provided. If so, we will have a conversation about it and try to do better.

Yes some concerns revolve around only reviewing one place mainly, which causes some suspicion. But, again, this is why we let people access other's reviews, so see trends, to help them with as much nuance as possible to decide how much weight to give this review/opinion.

Some folks will discount your reviews because they are super positive and of 1 place. Some people will discount my reviews because they are too long and I almost never give a NO unless I really have a bad time or some major disappointment in looks (and my bar for a good time I don't think is super high lmao). All of that is ok. Bashing is not.

Any ? post or DM.

 

[dickshawn]

I think that Wayne has a point. Getting the same person constantly reviewing the same place doesn't add value to the site. Maybe the OP, can mix it up and TOFTT and branch out to help give validity to his opinions. Try another place. You wouldn't want to read a restaurant reviewer write about the same restaurant every week.
I'm guilty of this, too. 90% of the time, I go to Sesame in the Suburbs or New Star the city. But what can I add that hasn't already been said 100 times about these places. Even if the review gets approved, it has no value. Many of the reviews that I have read, have made me try new places. The real reviewers on the site make this a very good resource for all of us to use. Thanks to them.
All of that being said, I don't think you can penalize people for guessing the wrong age. I have been so off on some of the girls. May of them could be a very put together 60 year old, or a 25 year old with miles on the tires.

 

[Keiner]

Even if there are no issues with the establishment or the review per se, I think the concern comes down to one word: credibility. Some folks have seen enough to have many doubts, but someone newer to the site might not realize they need a grain of salt (or two) to take with a particular review. My $0.02 Stay safe out there.

 

[Nikki Sixx]

Thing is, I'd like to sit back and wait for someone else to see and review, but it doesn't happen. I have to be the Guinea Pig, so to speak. Funny though, Guys will jump in once I see a Lady and write a review, and immediately hit back, having never seen the Lady, and for that matter having never posted about Sesame 54 EVER, outside of trying to slam my assessment.

I will write about another place soon, but having endured extreme mediocrity at other spots, is what keeps me anchored at the constantly high-performing Sesame 54.

 

[jim_hatez]

Thing is, I'd like to sit back and wait for someone else to see and review, but it doesn't happen. I have to be the Guinea Pig, so to speak. Funny though, Guys will jump in once I see a Lady and write a review, and immediately hit back, having never seen the Lady, and for that matter having never posted about Sesame 54 EVER, outside of trying to slam my assessment.

I will write about another place soon, but having endured extreme mediocrity at other spots, is what keeps me anchored at the constantly high-performing Sesame 54.

Well it happens, but not always as quick as you want.

As I said - people are free to disagree, but they should only disagree if they went and saw her based on your review and found it to be wildly inaccurate.

Sometimes "over the top reviews" are real. I got the perfect example.

"Shiny" is someone who has been praised left and right like crazy, some call her ATF, some the best in Philly.

Back when Shiny started out at Joys', LDX msg'ed me saying I gotta see her, she's the best, amazing in every way. I was torn. The pics at the time were just fair to me, so I never took the leap. LDX's message (all due respect to him) were over the top enthusiastic.

But, once she was in Philly and getting a lot of visitors, the overriding opinion on her is excellent, showing that LDX's enthusiasm is backed up by many others.

Hopefully that will be the case when the next monger reviews CC.

Have a great week,

jh

 

[markkennedy]

Thing is, I'd like to sit back and wait for someone else to see and review, but it doesn't happen. I have to be the Guinea Pig, so to speak. Funny though, Guys will jump in once I see a Lady and write a review, and immediately hit back, having never seen the Lady, and for that matter having never posted about Sesame 54 EVER, outside of trying to slam my assessment.

I will write about another place soon, but having endured extreme mediocrity at other spots, is what keeps me anchored at the constantly high-performing Sesame 54.

Out here in far West Montco, I'm kind of stuck with really 3 options, discounting all the DIY bullshit and the other places with saran wrap rubbers and faux rimmies and all the other trash. So of course can look my reviews, they center around these three places. I do have plenty of options and also a car, but I go where I want to go and I like what I want to like and I translate everyone's review into whether it's for me or no, and the result is, I review three stores mostly lol

So for you, you like that place, I have never been but it sounds pretty great there, I'd frequent it if it were in my normal area of ops, ignore people questioning your credibility. Ok branch out, but that's for you, no for them.

The intel portion, if is same dude reviewing same shop and same girl, as someone else mentioned, this is useless intel and a basically trash review. But seems like this store has a good parade of different gals, so of course you should do review! I review every new gal I see at Spring Rose, and they get two or three every month. I don't work for them, I just have a few options and am fortunate to love three of them. You keep rockin, I don't get out that way to see this shop, but it's pinned on my monger google map for next time I'm out there!