As one of the mongs who asked which pic looked most like her, I have noticed in the past with my visits usually out of 3-4 pics there is 1 that is most representative. I think that is helpful. Agreed all the pics "look like her" but there is obviously smoothing/photo editing done on the skin (getting rid of tats, making her body look more tight/perfect). Hannah was definitely good looking... and facially a very close match. But the body of course was not quite to the level of the pics, it rarely is. I also think the backside was made a little bigger in the one shot or she had more junk in the trunk years back. Yes, this is kinda splitting hairs, but some of us (I'm one) appreciate the additional details. Will it generally make me skip a session with the person? No... but at times like this (when EPM is rotating like 4 models, there is yet another new one posted today) it does help in decision making. Since most of these girls stay 1-2 weeks it seems, and at best I'm able to go visit 2x a month if that... I can make a more informed decision and pick the best option for me. After all that's what these reviews and board is all about.