Review: JX Spa

[Chiparlor]

Title: Review: JX Spa
Date: (DID NOT ANSWER QUESTION)
Phone:
City: Lancaster
State: PA
Activities: *Massage*
Age Estimate: 45
Nationality: Chinese
Physical Description: Attractive
Summary: Was there for the first time this week seeing two providers in the lobby. Chose a provider and was pleased with the outcome.

Click to unlock the hidden Private Details in this review

Recommendation: Yes

 

[Tym2pla]

Anyone else go here

 

[njo254]

Pretty useless review.

 

[Thebaron]

Went there 3 times Ada likes to flirt but nothing more

 

[Chiparlor]

Pretty useless review.

Trying to understand your perspective. Why is it useless review?

 

[fournman]

Trying to understand your perspective. Why is it useless review?

Vague and general

 

[Chiparlor]

Vague and general

As I said it was my first time there and I posted a honest review. If you think it is vague, that would be your problem because I am not going to exaggerate on something that was not done.

 

[Pattaya]

As I said it was my first time there and I posted a honest review. If you think it is vague, that would be your problem because I am not going to exaggerate on something that was not done.

Ada was fun to be with!!!

 

[Chiparlor]

Thank you Pattaya for backing me up.

 

[JimS]

As I said it was my first time there and I posted a honest review. If you think it is vague, that would be your problem because I am not going to exaggerate on something that was not done.

I think what he meant was, if there were no extras you could have said "no extras", then 90% (99%?) of the viewers could pass on by.
Then you haven't incriminated anyone.

 

[Chiparlor]

I think what he meant was, if there were no extras you could have said "no extras", then 90% (99%?) of the viewers could pass on by.
Then you haven't incriminated anyone.

Thanks for the feedback. My review is exactly "no extras" without saying extras. NJO254 does not practice what he preach and I just ignore him because one of his reviews were no better (also useless review proven by k). Fourman claimed vague and general. I know I was not vague on this review, and could understand his perspective of vague in his terms. Some readers would like specifics. I did not have any specifics to share making it "general" because there were no extras. I will continue the same way on my future reviews.