Review: Shirley - PH

[Boxypants]

Nah, based off my experiences I can confirm londonjack’s claim.

 

[Boxypants]

Don’t be so angry man. I never said I went for it, I just mean that it was offered. Obviously everyone should be safe in this hobby.

 

[Unregistered User]

Nah, based off my experiences I can confirm londonjack’s claim.

Same here.

joediamond either thinks he is the only one she is offering it up to ("Only with you, I promise"), or he got embarrassingly rejected despite being the Adonis he claims he is.

Just look at the way he responded: He first says he attempted to go bb, then angrily responded how dangerous bb is.

 

[joediamond65]

Same here.

joediamond either thinks he is the only one she is offering it up to ("Only with you, I promise"), or he got embarrassingly rejected despite being the Adonis he claims he is.

Just look at the way he responded: He first says he attempted to go bb, then angrily responded how dangerous bb is.

No I broached the subject after reading your bullshit review -and she said never , that this is simply not on the table therefore your review is what it is -a dream written by a little shrimp dick insecure storyteller

I’m not angry just tired of reading stores fabricated by little dweebs and their fairytales

 

[Unregistered User]

Uh.. I'm not the guy that wrote the review, internet tough guy

 

[Tarpon]

These girls are all whores, not angels. Why is it so hard to believe the occasional bb happens? Chill out

 

[david77]

For the record - there is a girl here that raw dogs it however I went straight to source and raw dogging PP Shirley is 100% bullshit - I also in the heat of passion. Tried to and was sternly told never to do that again from the source

Here’s to bovine scatology cheers

Well you mentioned " Tried to and was sternly told never to do that again from the source " sounds like you are saying tried too, did you tried or asked before. from my experience , there are providers if you do some services without asking, they either get upset or at least don,t allow, she maybe one of those types.

 

[Tarpon]

There are some girls that do BB, and that will always be the case. And it certainly will always be diff for each customer YMMV

 

[joediamond65]

I was merely responding to a thread posted by londonjack99. In his initial review he broached the subject of unprotected sex with a provider not I. I think this subject is better directed towards him as the progenitor at the top of this discussion. Having had an opportunity to discuss the validity of this claim with the said provider, in her own words, it never happened. Reviews like this portray the providers in a high risk spotlight, and affect their business. I felt the the integrity of this site is at risk. when untrue and fictitious portrayals of alleged time spent with a provider are allowed to go unchecked. Also the review states Shirley at PP in the description, however goes on the describe Shirley at PH, a different provider, in a different place with the same name. You mean he doesn't remember where this tryst took place? That should be corrected in fairness to all of the parties mentioned.

Clearly as the moderator, you are concerned that all hobbyists practice safe sex, otherwise it isn't a hobby, it becomes an unsafe dangerous environment. I did attempt to DM the originator, however was I unsuccessful at being able to find a link that allows me to communicate with him in that fashion. Thank You

 

[Schecter42]

I was merely responding to a thread posted by londonjack99. In his initial review he broached the subject of unprotected sex with a provider not I. I think this subject is better directed towards him as the progenitor at the top of this discussion. Having had an opportunity to discuss the validity of this claim with the said provider, in her own words, it never happened. Reviews like this portray the providers in a high risk spotlight, and affect their business. I felt the the integrity of this site is at risk. when untrue and fictitious portrayals of alleged time spent with a provider are allowed to go unchecked. Also the review states Shirley at PP in the description, however goes on the describe Shirley at PH, a different provider, in a different place with the same name. You mean he doesn't remember where this tryst took place? That should be corrected in fairness to all of the parties mentioned.

Clearly as the moderator, you are concerned that all hobbyists practice safe sex, otherwise it isn't a hobby, it becomes an unsafe dangerous environment. I did attempt to DM the originator, however was I unsuccessful at being able to find a link that allows me to communicate with him in that fashion. Thank You

How do you know the OP isn't telling the truth, and the provider isn't lying?

 

[joediamond65]

I'll keep it to direct mail, however if you take the time to read his review, and the other mongers replies, you will see he is talking about two different women in two different locations. One Shirley from PH and another from PP. I am referring to the one at PP. Now if he saw the Shirley at PH that is a different girl and I know that the mantra at PH is no anal ever. Therefore I divert back to PP for which some providers do openly engage. Why would Shirley lie to me? That is a service they get extra for? Why would she say no? If she provided that service, she would be looking to make money. It doesn't add up or make sense, Clearly this guy is a friend of yours and complained to you. I'm done with this thread. Moving on... have a nice day babe

 

[joediamond65]

done

 

[Koondog]

How do you know the OP isn't telling the truth, and the provider isn't lying?

Which indeed is WAY more likely.

 

[Glassdoor]

Gals who can work more than 6 months at PP, there are no borders. They need to survive the stiff competition for regulars. Open secret