AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Review: Suzie is back - Swan Lake

Rakethemin

Registered Member
Messages: 185
Reviews: 5
Joined
#13
To me yes. I was disgusted at some of the acronyms guys on this site participated in with her when I saw her. I opted for the very basic handy since I was there already. Not even the little head convinced me on this one
Wish I could see your reviews to see if we have similar tastes.
 

mitchellmichael

Review Contributor
Messages: 839
Reviews: 21
Joined
#15
She is pretty ugly
she is not a 7 that's for sure, but then again most of them are not. We are not taking them home to meet the parents or friends. We are their "one hour boyfriend" and as long as they take care of us, what do we care what they look like in the face. Do they make us feel good? If yes, it doesn't matter. Your an idiot if you think otherwise.
 

Theman012

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,216
Reviews: 23
Joined
#16
It feels a bit disgusting and degrading having any kind of intercourse with an old ugly woman. If she was at the very least a bit younger then I somewhat agree. But extremely old, ugly, 0 assets, massage is normal u can get that anywhere. What the hell are u dudes going to her for with Jenny right across the room. Just my opinion. And no problem if u go to her and sincerely enjoy it but wow some reviews on here are extremely misleading. Call it how it is guys. I sometimes question if guys are blind or just never been with an attractive woman
 

mitchellmichael

Review Contributor
Messages: 839
Reviews: 21
Joined
#17
Dude why are u going so hard in defense of her or any provider? We just have very different tastes. But forgetting about both of our tastes, in a general sense talking about attractiveness she is not at all a woman any guy would say yeah that’s an attractive woman. I never said anything about her services or what she’s willing to do. I simply said she is pretty ugly. And no I go for anybody in this hobby even had a handful of gilfs, not purely 10s which are also rare. Again my point was other reviews misled me to believe she was a younger more attractive woman which she’s far from. Literally as I was sitting up on the table and she was working down low, in my mind I couldn’t believe some of the stuff guys partook in with her. BUT to each his own, like I said this is MY opinion which aligns with the general definition of attractiveness. And dude damn sounds like u could’ve had an awesome 3 some there, that would’ve been an experience
not defending her at all. I would NOT date her. I am just saying that not all providers are 10's or even 8's and you can't judge a book by its cover.
 

Rakethemin

Registered Member
Messages: 185
Reviews: 5
Joined
#18
I see nothing wrong with raising our standards when shelling out hard earned money. The woman who surprised me in Paris set the bar very high. I see no reason not to hold off for the same level of beauty + connection.

Notice I’m not using the word service. Service means nothing to me without natural connection. I’ve had my share of strong connections with gals I wouldn’t look twice at in the street, but no more. Once you cook with gas, there’s no going back.

More importantly, the point above was to call out erroneous reports. Not even subjective, just not factually correct. Sure, beauty is subjective, but I almost shelled out time + money (+ self-respect) to someone based on false advertising. And, I do mean false advertising.
 
Top