I'm talking about the scene in the Bay Area, but the trend seems to sadly be taking place around the USA. I do mean quality as more of looks, I admit. From my point of view, I prefer looks over service, otherwise, what's the point? It goes back to incentives. Why couldn't we get both? That means that prices should go up, which is fine. But currently, why am I paying more and getting less? Most OGs would agree that we had better talent in the past, and I always advocated for higher prices:
-It makes it easier to book.
-Girls are less burned out, will take care of better care of themselves.
-It will attract higher quality talent.
-Shills would be to a minimum, there will be less reviews overall.
-Less worry about STDs, as demand drops a bit due to pricing.
-Physical and emotional security of the girls. If it's cheaper, you just attract cheaper mongers. There's a good reason why Beverly Hills is safer than Compton.
That's why I cling to certain hotties because it is possible to have both. But somethings gotta give, and that is, stop incentivizing orgs that bring low quality. Vote with your wallet. I rarely go to orgs now, but I do have the luxury of using SeekingArrangements and flying to South America or elsewhere in the world whenever I want, so I guess it's all relative. So you guys can have all the GILFY hags while I get quality + service elsewhere. I just refuse to keep up the status quo. Nothing will change here until the incentivizing stops.
And yes, we do get gems from time to time, fortunately. The last one for me was sadly, BGC Nova. If anyone knows where she is now, I'm definitely willing to pay $ for that information (if it's accurate). It's sad that I even have to say that, because BGC had Jen, Louisa, and other hotties earlier this year and late last year.
haha