-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Who in their right mind would get verified??
- Thread starter Iguana717
- Start date
To each their own. I just shared what I know. You make you choices. Good luck and be well, all!
All these places like a specific type I guess
A well known member recommended me to a popular place who's MMS has a presence on this board, all went well until they asked for ID, I emailed a copy of my DL..... and I am yet to receive a response, even a kindly fuck off would have sufficed.
Knowing that these places are interconnected through referrals, I will not even try getting into another of these places.
A well known member recommended me to a popular place who's MMS has a presence on this board, all went well until they asked for ID, I emailed a copy of my DL..... and I am yet to receive a response, even a kindly fuck off would have sufficed.
Knowing that these places are interconnected through referrals, I will not even try getting into another of these places.
depends on the provider and the place and the verification required.
different requirements if FS seems expected. but a driver's license as a requirement (rather than one of many verification options) seems excessive.
and the data privacy laws absolutely suck and do not reflect the times. many providers don't seem to factor that as a reason for some clients' reluctance, but then i guess they figure they're putting themselves in hella jeopardy relative to any client, so why should clients argue. that's fair enough, to an extent, and untrustworthy dudes very likely want to snake their way around verification, so many providers reasonably suspicious of anyone who asks too many Qs.
but if any providers lurking, two suggestions for verification: 1. even if not yr main email address, offering an encrypted email address (available for free) to those who would rather use those platforms. and 2. if requiring an advance, offering a payment option that's not posted somewhere, so that when the unusual paypal charge to "sexworker99" sneaks onto the banking statement, then at least the Ggle returns that follow don't lead smack dab to yr page. providers who offer flexible verification (at whatever scrutiny) make business nicer!
different requirements if FS seems expected. but a driver's license as a requirement (rather than one of many verification options) seems excessive.
and the data privacy laws absolutely suck and do not reflect the times. many providers don't seem to factor that as a reason for some clients' reluctance, but then i guess they figure they're putting themselves in hella jeopardy relative to any client, so why should clients argue. that's fair enough, to an extent, and untrustworthy dudes very likely want to snake their way around verification, so many providers reasonably suspicious of anyone who asks too many Qs.
but if any providers lurking, two suggestions for verification: 1. even if not yr main email address, offering an encrypted email address (available for free) to those who would rather use those platforms. and 2. if requiring an advance, offering a payment option that's not posted somewhere, so that when the unusual paypal charge to "sexworker99" sneaks onto the banking statement, then at least the Ggle returns that follow don't lead smack dab to yr page. providers who offer flexible verification (at whatever scrutiny) make business nicer!
the request for an email from a business address again depends if the provider uses an email address that's not "sexworker@hotmail.fuck." if they offer an anonymous email address to send a nondescript msg, i'd rather that than a thread scheduling times w. a mugshot and a driver's license!
I'm curious about your response.... have you ever verified with one of these agencies?
I am asking based on simple observation, many of these agencies have been around for quite a few years, under different names sometimes, but they are not some startup.
And if they were new, you will mind that the " boss" is someone who has already established themselves in the biz thus being able to pull not only clients but also employees.
Now even though I am not a great fan of agencies, I am able to deduce that much. Also, even with the abundance of dunces in this hobby, it can be said that the majority of guys who will be going to these places, would not send an email to " sexworker@hotmail.fuck"
I am asking based on simple observation, many of these agencies have been around for quite a few years, under different names sometimes, but they are not some startup.
And if they were new, you will mind that the " boss" is someone who has already established themselves in the biz thus being able to pull not only clients but also employees.
Now even though I am not a great fan of agencies, I am able to deduce that much. Also, even with the abundance of dunces in this hobby, it can be said that the majority of guys who will be going to these places, would not send an email to " sexworker@hotmail.fuck"
Get yourself a monger ID just like your daughter does to go partying: https://www.cardsmen.com/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIj5-8sdvh-wIVhMDICh1fvwbdEAAYASAAEgIGw_D_BwE
that was exaggerated for effect, but agencies aren't the only ones who request these sorts of verification, and often the emails they use are easily traced to their ads or pages.
and agreed w.others that these usually aren't binaries of "imminent danger vs. zero risk" or "verification vs. unverified," but i'd rather not leaving such a blatant paper trail for spouses or bosses, or the data miners w. unregulated access to that data, or providers or agencies who have overextended their risk.
and agreed w.others that these usually aren't binaries of "imminent danger vs. zero risk" or "verification vs. unverified," but i'd rather not leaving such a blatant paper trail for spouses or bosses, or the data miners w. unregulated access to that data, or providers or agencies who have overextended their risk.
SENATOR, unless you’re in a position of fame/power/moral exemplar, like a politician/priest/rabbi, what’s the WORST that could happen?
Your name becomes PUBLIC?
Just shrug it off and say “That’s a DIFFERENT “Joe Schmoe!”
Your name becomes PUBLIC?
Just shrug it off and say “That’s a DIFFERENT “Joe Schmoe!”
but if you're mugging next to yr license as requested by the provider, that would seem to identify ya pretty quickly.
and why would you need to qualify as a clergyman or a politician for an employer or spouse to use that against you?