AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

hey guys lets tone it down

driverseven

Registered Member
Messages: 375
Reviews: 7
Joined
#41
Lmaooooo these type of reviews have been going on forever on BGFE, tna, UG. Just cause spahunter used codes or less. What happened to them?? Le knows what's up. Best thing is to have only info accessible to members. Even then Le can make up and acct to read things.
That's not true. Only a handful of high profile places are reviewed on those boards. We're talking here about the many UTR places and ladies who are never reviewed there. SpaHunters had reviews of hundreds of those places.
 

Wayne1250

Review Contributor
Messages: 11,084
Reviews: 96
Joined
#42
I have had many providers say to hold off on reviews. Or not to say certain things. As noisy as I am I walk around with many things left unsaid.

Keeping the amount of detail down is the best for everyone. Just PM for more detail, I do, some mongers give it and some are still protective of their girl.

One of the best things about the site is we can find where some girls go as they change spas. Even if they change names with a little work it eventually comes out in public or private. I have this site to thank for helping me find a provider that I lost track of when she left a spa. Only saw her once so I never got any contact info.

Keep it safe.
 

cabinet

Registered Member
Messages: 31
Reviews: 1
Joined
#43
So what is the purpose of the board? To provide reviews that avoid any mention or indication of extras? Or to give information only to those who can see private details or better yet, through PM, which is incredibly inefficient. It seems this exists already as YELP for therapeutic massage. I’m not trying to incite an argument, I’m being serious. It seems that in an attempt to avoid incriminating posts (which I think are not incriminating in any practical way) we actually defeat the purpose of the board to share information necessary to avoid TOFTT situations.
What you say is true but look at it like this. Why does the same places get reviewed every week. Same girl alot of the time. This is mind boggling. Just look at how many time dadada is being reviewed. Sure it might be a great place (I've never been) but really
A place only needs to be reviewed a couple of times before we get the point..
 

Ellocohombre

Review Contributor
Messages: 7,177
Reviews: 51
Joined
#45
I would say 1 review each 3 months is required to see private details. That way you would cut down on 75% of reviews being posted. The one that gets to me also is on discussion boards. Members put right in the heading very explicit request. Then to top it off another member actually answers them. Most of us seasoned members know this should take place through PM only.
More than half the members on here are probably former SH members. Over there we did things differently. We established ourselves as trusted members and communicated via PM if needed. Sure it involved some extra time, money and work but we did ok. So let's see what happens.
 

paco2888

AKA jacklondongreat
Messages: 2,009
Reviews: 21
Joined
#46
That's a fair question. It may be level of detail is the issue.

Whatever it may be, after years of going to AMPs, it was the first time masseuses said anything to me about reviews.
No question that the issue is the level of detail. I'm not suggesting that fewer details will fool LE, but the egos of some of the writers pushes them to write novels as if they were trying to sell a porn movie script starring them. The bigger problem is that it becomes fodder for some enterprising reporter who decides he/she has discovered the scandal of the century and embarks on another investigative reporting crusade. A few acronyms are more than sufficient, perhaps supplemented by a physical description of the provider. PM for all else.
 

Dc46

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,499
Reviews: 29
Joined
#47
The only thing that bothers me with only pming private details is you now have a two tier system. Those worthy of the information and those who aren’t.

How do you decide who is worthy and who isn’t?

There may be a guy who can only hobby once or twice a month. So he won’t have the reviews or number of posts, does that make him not worthy to be helped out?

So it’s a slippery slope to only give private details only by PM.
 

njlefty

Registered Member
Messages: 2,418
Reviews: 5
Joined
#48
The only thing that bothers me with only pming private details is you now have a two tier system. Those worthy of the information and those who aren’t.

How do you decide who is worthy and who isn’t?

There may be a guy who can only hobby once or twice a month. So he won’t have the reviews or number of posts, does that make him not worthy to be helped out?

So it’s a slippery slope to only give private details only by PM.
We're all in a rock and a hard place.

We'd like to be helpful on the public board but we have to remember two things:

1. There is more scrutiny today of websites (Federal law passed last April, another one may be done this year).

2. AMPs have addresses, they are fixed targets for LE. We have to be mindful that items posted could bring attention. I have seen articles that state a raid was initiated after information was found on websites.
 

Uniquelyme

Review Contributor
Messages: 7,859
Reviews: 167
Joined
#49
I would say 1 review each 3 months is required to see private details. That way you would cut down on 75% of reviews being posted. The one that gets to me also is on discussion boards. Members put right in the heading very explicit request. Then to top it off another member actually answers them. Most of us seasoned members know this should take place through PM only.
More than half the members on here are probably former SH members. Over there we did things differently. We established ourselves as trusted members and communicated via PM if needed. Sure it involved some extra time, money and work but we did ok. So let's see what happens.
Spa hunters is dead. No need to keep talking about what it was. I get your concern. I guess some really Utr places don't talk about em. However there are many that LE is fully aware of. I found SH funny how they tried and mask things. Everyone including Le knew what was up. Hence it not being around anymore!!
 

Wormwood1988

Registered Member
Messages: 298
Reviews: 4
Joined
#50
Thanks for all the responses. I appreciate your point of view and I understand better where you all are coming from despite my disagreement about some of the fundamental assumptions that are being made. At least we had a civil conversation and didn’t talk past one another. Thank you all for that.
 

Glass Onion

Registered Member
Messages: 226
Reviews: 1
Joined
#51
The whole point of this board is to get juicy details. We don’t need more censorship. The more detail the more service we get since they must compete .
 

Myhobby

Mod
Messages: 395
Reviews: 19
Joined
#52
The whole point of the board is to get accurate information. Some are posting reviews with no dates. Dates must be included so we know posting are not 1 or 2 years old. Also, be mindful that some providers do not want to be reviewed. Please respect that! Some censorship is required because folks do not follow the rules.
 

ASHP585

Registered Member
Messages: 622
Reviews: 24
Joined
#55
this is the point the girls and owners are now saying something.
I get what you are saying, but again. Until the admins actually lay out guidelines for what is acceptable and what isn't across the board, policing isn't going to work. Especially since I am sure, even for the guys on the same page as us, we are going to have varying levels of details we'd like to see.

As for the girls, they should understand as well that nobody has control over what is going on. Maybe they can blacklist some customers if they can identify them by the explicit details. I am sure if I gave the COMPLETE play by play like some of these guys do, the lady would know who wrote it. Lol. But that's only going to go so far,too. It's got to start with the people that have control over the posts going live in the first place.
 

Buttlover

Review Contributor
Messages: 365
Reviews: 53
Joined
#56
No need to tone it down. What’s the point of this board otherwise? Do you really think that the police don’t know what’s going on in these places. Or that if we “tone it down” or talk about hearing billy Joel or frank Sinatra sing it will somehow make a difference. Or how about we use decimal places to dilineate a tip. SH if I saw a .6 house 1.0 tip I knew it was full service. So ridiculous. Keep up the details and hope you’re not balls deep in some Asian tang when a raid happens. I do agree with the moderators adjusting the sign in so that the reviews don’t show up in google. That’s as far as I will go with toning it down.
 

Buttlover

Review Contributor
Messages: 365
Reviews: 53
Joined
#57
I feel like Firr is that guy that runs around scolding everyone at a college party that we are being too loud. Nothing but a buzzkill. Then his reviews are completely useless on top of it.
 

Buttlover

Review Contributor
Messages: 365
Reviews: 53
Joined
#60
That was on the other review thread where you were spewing the same tone it down shit on that thread. Got that chicken little. The sky is falling too. I’ve been doing this for 20 years. These places come and go. It’s the nature of the game. But keep running around with your doomsday predictions instead of actually contributing useful information. Keep shrouding yourself under the shield of secrecy. Douchebag. The only police giving me problems is you the fun police. Your reviews are basically useless and you don’t contribute anyway.
 
Top