Simply put... He went to the AMP because there was less risk (in hindsight... an assumption that didn't hold up lol). If he has his own masseuse, he would have to pay her either on salary or contract. That is a paper trail but also... He has to pay her good or to keep quiet. Keep in mind that what happend to the late Stan Lee (accused of assult in Chicago 2018 by a contracted masseuse). Kraft tried to keep if simple but obviously... Florida had very different ideas.
-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Robert Kraft
- Thread starter Unknown9988
- Start date
I don't think there are hidden cameras om the massage rooms where the customers are only hearing boxers. Or some earing nothing at all. It must be some type of privacy violation. No judge would sign off on it. IF they are caught going in and out of the massage room, they can just deny it...….
Sounds like some woman customer was in there for a "regular" massage and she figured out what was going down....and she made a formal complaint that kicked off this whole thing....
Sounds like some woman customer was in there for a "regular" massage and she figured out what was going down....and she made a formal complaint that kicked off this whole thing....
"Inside The Happy Orchid" This is not Kraft but............. https://www.xvideos.com/video9316642/_420_cute_little_asian_mika_kim_gives_old_man_happy_ending
conspiracy theory - this Kraft thing is all staged....
NFL and the team owners have been losing money since this kneeling business. NFL recently allegedly paid 80 million to Kaepernick to go away......
this is just a distraction.
How many LE do you know spend this type of resources - surveillance cameras (with all the paperwork with a judge), staged bomb scare, road blocks to question johns. and this went on for months. They must have couple guys full time on this. All just for victimless crimes?? They could have sent vice detectives for couple visits and the place would be shut down in a week.
Just my 2c
NFL and the team owners have been losing money since this kneeling business. NFL recently allegedly paid 80 million to Kaepernick to go away......
this is just a distraction.
How many LE do you know spend this type of resources - surveillance cameras (with all the paperwork with a judge), staged bomb scare, road blocks to question johns. and this went on for months. They must have couple guys full time on this. All just for victimless crimes?? They could have sent vice detectives for couple visits and the place would be shut down in a week.
Just my 2c
No doubt Kraft is the target, not the spa itself. Those LE want to make the fame by catching a big fish. If just targeting the spa, couple of weeks of surveillance cam is good enough not need a couple of months.
On the other hand, such practice may not be legal as it violates people's privacy. Table shower and massage are legal inside the spa and such surveillance camera did capture those actions as well. There might even be women inside to have massage. Recording what happened inside the spa is violating people's privacy. Putting cam inside is just like putting a cam inside a restroom with the excuse to stop people selling drug inside. Pretty sure that Kraft's lawyer will fight that in the court. Once that video cannot be used as evident, the case will be thrown out.
On the other hand, such practice may not be legal as it violates people's privacy. Table shower and massage are legal inside the spa and such surveillance camera did capture those actions as well. There might even be women inside to have massage. Recording what happened inside the spa is violating people's privacy. Putting cam inside is just like putting a cam inside a restroom with the excuse to stop people selling drug inside. Pretty sure that Kraft's lawyer will fight that in the court. Once that video cannot be used as evident, the case will be thrown out.
It's definitely a fluid situation legally because (I've heard) that what providers do now is just provide the service and the guy just tips on the back end with NO mention of money or additional compensation for any additional service. So that if it is a sting, on either side, there's plausible deniability and no verbal quid pro quo. The masseuse can simply claim that she found him attractive and got carried away with no expectation of compensation. The customer can simply claim that what happened was in the course of two adults finding each other attractive with no business component to it.
That's the thing with a 'social crime' like prostitituon. Where does dating stop and prostitution begin legally? If there's a video camera present and they say that they're doing porn or a webcam show, does it then become legal?
That's the thing with a 'social crime' like prostitituon. Where does dating stop and prostitution begin legally? If there's a video camera present and they say that they're doing porn or a webcam show, does it then become legal?