I think admin accepts sloppy description on location for the safety issue but they don't take any insufficient description on provider's physical description or service.
In fact, we don't even like exact locations...just a general vicinity is more than enough, and should be best practice. And especially so for places that screen. We also don't want specific hotel/motel names, or even cross streets...just general area is the only thing we're looking for. Midtown East or UES. Around Fort Lee highways. Chinatown, Philly. Mid-scale hotel. And so on.
Also, we are not necessarily looking for graphic details about service...sure, some members like to see all the acronyms offered/done, but we're not even necessarily asking for that, though that style is welcomed. There are plenty of things to write about, without getting super specific, erotic-fiction, type of reviews...write as much as you're comfortable writing. The decor and cleanliness of the spa and how the rest of the facilities are. The parking situation, if applicable. Whether the spot is discrete. If they have table showers and how many. If the walls go all the way up and you get complete privacy. If there were any funny odors or questionable sights. The quality of their candy bowl. Your provider's attitude and personality. Massage skills, or lack thereof. How she was dressed, her command of the English language, and any other thing that stands out in your mind.
What we WILL reject are those super vague reviews that's half-assed "went there, the girl walked in, gave me a massage, flipped after 10 minutes, and standard finish" or "she's been reviewed many times so I won't get into it" or similar type of reviews. There's a clear distinction between being discrete and being lazy/not put any effort into a review.
We also understand that certain spas in smaller towns need to be discrete for their safety, so writing reviews in sort of an UTR way is understandable. But again, there's a difference between being discrete and being vague...the latter will be rejected.
Remember that the review writer is the one trying to earn free access, and they need to put in a bit of work to get it. Also, the mods are LOOKING for reasons to approve the review, and DISLIKE rejecting reviews...because a) it creates more work for us, since we have to type in reasons why it was rejected and then go back and forth with the member to clarify (and sometimes get a lot of shit and even cursed out at at times) vs. an approval, which is just one click for us, and b) we want ALL of our members to earn the private access, since our site operates on the premise of valuable private details content, and is the foundation of our intel.
So give us reasons to approve your review, and we'll gladly do it. But some members would rather argue and complain and spend an inordinate amount of time trying to convince us otherwise, when all they have to do is follow simple instructions that are much easier and much less time-consuming than arguing with us.
That said, sometimes we make mistakes too...we might have rejected a review for not including a name (which was later mentioned in the body of the review itself that we missed), or something similar like that...and in those cases, a polite PM to any one of us, pointing out your reasoning, will give us incentive to take a second look. If your PM is like the following: "wtf? why was it rejected when tons of other reviews are even more vague?" or something similar (we have tons of other examples like that) or douche-y or entitled like that, why should we help you? We're all about the golden rule, and if you're polite and respectful, you'll receive the same. Act like an asshole, and we'll treat you like one too.
