FEEDBACK REQUESTED: New York Forum Layout

[Vaupe]

Is it possible to have a Chinatown forum within NY? It is a distinctly different demographic within NYC on many levels. Distinguishing it from ES,WS,UES,UWS, midtown would be great IMHO

Safe mongering all

 

[HansBelding]

Is it possible to have a Chinatown forum within NY? It is a distinctly different demographic within NYC on many levels. Distinguishing it from ES,WS,UES,UWS, midtown would be great IMHO

Safe mongering all

i agree that would be a good idea

 

[Chinatownluv]

Chinatown Manhattan section

 

[mmboy]

a harlem/BRonx section

Yes please!

 

[CraneRon]

Chinatown Manhattan section

I still think this was/is a good idea. Chinatown Manhattan is a different zone in terms of location and a different category in terms of service and rates and environment (for better and worse, depending on preferences)

 

[mmboy]

Yes please!

Harlem/Bronx please!

 

[WetNoodle69]

Would love a Bronx section

 

[sinyalekf]

100% approve

 

[Edmond D.]

As long as this site is no longer EXCLUSIVELY oriented towards actual AMPs, then it would DEFINITELY benefit from a separate BRONX section.

There is PLENTY of UTR "activity" in the BX, predominantly with F.O.B. Latinas in "fast houses."

I'm sure your run of the mill members would DEFINITELY benefit from any info on these "underground" spots in the BX.

 

[aldoserioso]

Would like see reviewers enter their age range. Helps establish a better point of view and in some cases increase viewers empathy

That could be useful. I know that I am a very different monger in my 60s than in my early 40s- much less likely to be taken advantage of, more accepting of older bodies, much better game, more willing to pay more and pay less for different levels of service.

 

[brooklynight]

(Mods - not sure if this suggestion belongs here or in the similar topic in the general forum, so feel free to move if needed)

I'd like to recommend standardization in the phone number field when submitting reviews to make searching by phone number more valuable. For example - say an AMP or provider has the number 333-444-5555. Some reviewers will enter "3334445555" in the phone field, while others will enter "333-444-5555" or "333.444.5555" or "(333) 444-5555" etc. If I now search for "3334445555", only reviews that match that format EXACTLY will come up. Even if I search by the last four digits 5555, only the reviews that have that on its own or preceded by a separator character (e.g. "-" or ".") will come up. Searching by phone number is often times the only way to pull up prior reviews of a given provider, especially if they a) have a name that is 3 letters or less, which is currently unsearchable, or b) are an agency without a name, e.g. the Hungarian shops in Brooklyn.

I think the easiest fix would be to strip all non-numeric characters from the phone field when reviews are submitted; alternatively, allowing sub-string matches in searches would at least allow looking up by the last 4 digits to work. Otherwise the site is great, keep up the good work!

 

[Green Hornet]

Flushing should stay independent. Maybe you should have a Bronx forum.

 

[Left]

Also is there a way to have the ethnicity or nationality in the subject the top line or have ut as an option to sort by nationality or ethnicity . I am mostly a rmp Caucasian or Latina hobbyist and unless you know the spas it’s more work to identify what spa ethnicity are . Thanks and I know it’s high maintenance but I think there are others who would like this feature

 

[MongerHard]

I still think NJ needs another section lol. Summit and Toms River should not both be in Central.
Ok off my soapbox lol.

 

[MongerHard]

(Mods - not sure if this suggestion belongs here or in the similar topic in the general forum, so feel free to move if needed)

I'd like to recommend standardization in the phone number field when submitting reviews to make searching by phone number more valuable. For example - say an AMP or provider has the number 333-444-5555. Some reviewers will enter "3334445555" in the phone field, while others will enter "333-444-5555" or "333.444.5555" or "(333) 444-5555" etc. If I now search for "3334445555", only reviews that match that format EXACTLY will come up. Even if I search by the last four digits 5555, only the reviews that have that on its own or preceded by a separator character (e.g. "-" or ".") will come up. Searching by phone number is often times the only way to pull up prior reviews of a given provider, especially if they a) have a name that is 3 letters or less, which is currently unsearchable, or b) are an agency without a name, e.g. the Hungarian shops in Brooklyn.

I think the easiest fix would be to strip all non-numeric characters from the phone field when reviews are submitted; alternatively, allowing sub-string matches in searches would at least allow looking up by the last 4 digits to work. Otherwise the site is great, keep up the good work!

This guy works in IT lol

 

[Wokjohn435]

I second the phone number change, with it having to be xxx-xxx-xxxx

Also I think it would be great to add a Zip Code to the reviews so that we can easily find areas more easily. Maybe make that be a members only feature?

 

[gogeta]

Would it be possible to add reactions?

Current state: like button only.

 

[Cof e-talk]

I haven’t read through the entire thread, but the addition of buttons to indicate if breasts are natural or man made, and same for butts. Many reviews don’t indicate, and like me, I’ll bet those variables weigh heavily on the decision who to see.

 

[glider]

I would say that so many people, when putting in the price, leave out whether it was a half an hour or a full hour. Whether that's a box to fill in or just a word from the Moderator(s) when submitting a review...it would be very helpful.

 

[Sbwyjrdxo]

A Bronx forum would be good.