AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Tips on Maintaining Active Membership

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wayne1250

Review Contributor
Messages: 11,062
Reviews: 95
Joined
#86
Why not just have a private section for members only? Am i misunderstanding this, or does this rule essentially ban any discussion of reviews?
No but just keep the review discussion to more general comments. Or make a new thread in the Private section and continue from there.
 

topjimmy

Administrator
Messages: 495
Joined
#88
No it doesn’t ban discussion of reviews. You need to be careful when you reply to a review. The Private Details, assuming you can see that, is NOT viewable to the general public. Your reply IS viewable to the general public. So if you happen to mention details about the session that were placed in the Private Details in your reply, you essentially just revealed what was intended to be kept private, viewable only to the members who earned that access or paid for it.

The penalty for being reckless with your reply and revealing something that the author intended to stay private is loss of posting privileges.

It’s a serious breach. We are going to take it seriously. We aren’t going to pick and choose which breaches are bad and which ones weren’t. We are going to inforce it down the line. Some people are probably gonna get suspended from the board over it until everyone learns how to properly reply without revealing details that need to stay private. Maybe not forever, but long enough that they get the message.

And even though some would want everyone to believe there’s a bunch of confusion and chaos over this, ever since I posted this not one person has been banned. So evidently a lot of people get the concept. It’s nothing new. The strict enforcement of Private Details, or “Rest of the Story” or “BCD” or “Men’s Lounge” or “Locker Room” content has been going on close to 2 decades. Most of our members have already participated on boards who do the exact same thing.

It is what it is gentlemen. Not sure I can be any more clear than that. If you’re still confused I can’t help ya. Just hang around awhile and figure it out on your own. Or ask one of the more seasoned members of the board to help you understand.
Have a great day
 

Wayne1250

Review Contributor
Messages: 11,062
Reviews: 95
Joined
#89
TJ Is there a duration of the suspended posting privileges for a first offense or it is a forever thing? This a small detail which has not been totally discussed.
 

kgmspa

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,347
Reviews: 4
Joined
#92
For me I welcome TopJimmy desire to make money and provide enforced policy concerning private details!

The issue can never really be resolved. I will say this - be careful what you say and always respect your massage girl! Be nice, treat her with kindness, and just don't talk about her! Be thankful for what she does! :)
 

jfox987

Review Contributor
Messages: 503
Reviews: 51
Joined
#96
I would suggest a two month suspension. One not enough, three too long.
perhaps an escalating scale? first offense one month then two then you're out of here.
sometimes it is easy to make a simple mistake if someone posts: "when i was done with my session with coco and was leaving mamasan introduced to me to the hottest amp girl i've ever seen, she had blue hair"
then someone in the public comments posts "what was the name of the girl with the blue hair?" they might think its an innocent questions because it has nothing to do with the original review of coco.
but its still a violation of the rules
 

Freddy

Registered Member
Messages: 243
Joined
#97
The term is banned, what is now being suggested by some is a suspension. I’m satisfied that actions are being taken and measures put in place, whether or not I agree with new rules is outweighed by the fact review discretion is now in place.
 

topjimmy

Administrator
Messages: 495
Joined
#98
I’m not making suggestions Freddy. I’m telling you how it is.

Banned and Suspension is one in the same. Folks familiar with discussion board lingo are aware of this.

If you’re banned, you’ve lost your ability to post. Also known as loss of posting privleges.

It’s not a violation that’s deserving of permanent banishment from the board.

In general it could be a 30-day suspension of posting privileges; but staff will look at each case, assess the damage, and issue the penalty. If a member continues to repeatedly reveal private content from posts and reviews then yes, the penalty could become progressively worse until it’s no longer an issue one way or another. We could also look at it and determine that there was no damage done at all, depending on factors like what content specifically was revealed and how long the content was in public view before staff was able to make corrections. It’s possible that if it was caught immediately and nobody saw it before staff cleaned it up, that only a stern warning is necessary.

You folks can discuss it to your heart’s content, but ultimately it will be a staff decision based on staff judgement, and will be implemented as staff sees fit.
 

Uniquelyme

Review Contributor
Messages: 7,834
Reviews: 165
Joined
#99
I’m not making suggestions Freddy. I’m telling you how it is.

Banned and Suspension is one in the same. Folks familiar with discussion board lingo are aware of this.

If you’re banned, you’ve lost your ability to post. Also known as loss of posting privleges.

It’s not a violation that’s deserving of permanent banishment from the board.

In general it could be a 30-day suspension of posting privileges; but staff will look at each case, assess the damage, and issue the penalty. If a member continues to repeatedly reveal private content from posts and reviews then yes, the penalty could become progressively worse until it’s no longer an issue one way or another. We could also look at it and determine that there was no damage done at all, depending on factors like what content specifically was revealed and how long the content was in public view before staff was able to make corrections. It’s possible that if it was caught immediately and nobody saw it before staff cleaned it up, that only a stern warning is necessary.

You folks can discuss it to your heart’s content, but ultimately it will be a staff decision based on staff judgement, and will be implemented as staff sees fit.
Most people here I would think are aware a ban is that a ban aka suspension. And that a banishment is blacklisted or whatever term staff would implement.

I figured this is how it would be staff reviewing and deciding what the offense warrants as far as length of ban.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top